-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
feat: (Codecov) add updateRepository function to update local storage and url query params for repo selection #89818
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
adrian-codecov
wants to merge
14
commits into
master
from
adrian/feat-add-update-repository-url-and-storage-fns
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
14 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e324e6c
feat: add updateRepository function to update local storage and url q…
adrian-codecov 3aabb4e
adjust repository type to also be optional
adrian-codecov 7945e2b
adjust some types to be non-optional
adrian-codecov 51b32df
adjust logic to separate codecov + sentry types
adrian-codecov 0242720
Adjust tests with page filters fixtures
adrian-codecov 1f3d543
merge
adrian-codecov 792ac7d
fix eslint CI errors
adrian-codecov 0e6177f
Adjust code based on pr feedback
adrian-codecov 58e005b
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into adrian/feat-add-upd…
adrianviquez 61467db
added missing PR comment
adrianviquez 0b0ef49
Adjust jsdocs
adrianviquez 0d0e818
merge
adrianviquez d56330a
Adjust new tests
adrianviquez 12c7ad0
Merge branch 'master' into adrian/feat-add-update-repository-url-and-…
adrianviquez File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why do we need a distinction of Codecov vs Sentry? If we are merging Codecov to Sentry, then this should not exist, and it should just be Sentry going forward.
I'm not a fan of this approach, as I'm fairly sure it will linger around until someone ultimately needs to address it (at which point, we'll have a lot of the code relying on this and it'll be a massive PITA to update)