🤖 Refactor get_file_contents Method to Enforce Repo Name Requirement #848
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
👋 Hi there! This PR was automatically generated by Autofix 🤖
This fix was triggered by Jenn Mueng
Fixes SEER-7F
This update modifies the
get_file_contents
method in theautofix_context.py
file. The previous implementation included a comment about duplicated functionality with theget_documents
method in theCodebaseIndex
class. The new implementation removes this comment and introduces a check to ensure that arepo_name
is provided when callingget_file_contents
. Ifrepo_name
isNone
, the method now raises aValueError
with a message indicating that a repo name is required because multiple repositories are present. This change ensures that the method operates correctly in environments with multiple repositories by enforcing the provision of a repository name.If you have any questions or feedback for the Sentry team about this fix, please email [email protected] with the Run ID (see below).
🤓 Stats for the nerds:
Run ID: 381
Prompt tokens: 43853
Completion tokens: 3275
Total tokens: 47128