Repository navigation
v1.91.167.0 fix(evals): plan-design focus and tpa pitch detectors accept the rewordings Opus 5.5 uses (GSTA-57) - #3320
Merged
Conversation
…rdings Opus 5.5 uses (GSTA-57) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
😎 This pull request was merged. |
…-design-tpa Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> # Conflicts: # CHANGELOG.md
…-design-tpa Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> # Conflicts: # CHANGELOG.md
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
garrytan
force-pushed
the
flaky/2026-10-20-plan-design-tpa
branch
from
October 20, 2026 17:53
66f7da3 to
a3c2773
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Daily flaky-fix pass (GSTA-57), group 1 plus one group 5 detector.
plan-design-with-ui-scope went red three times on the flaky ledger with
ceiling_reached; no acknowledged Design focus and subsequent review question(runs 39315041557, 39344306426, 39363705692, attempt 1 each, slice 4). In all three the agent asked Step 0D and answered an issue-labelled finding. Two of them already pass on main's T1b detector. Run 39363705692, the one after T1b, worded the 0A rating "I rated this plan 4/10 for design completeness" and the option "All 7 areas (recommended)", and the detector only accepted "on design completeness" and "dimensions|passes". The repair defines the input class instead of adding another spelling:tpa-absent-darwin (run 39315041557, slice 14): "If you want to use Aside: download it (macOS 15+) at aside.com, open it, sign in, and re-run" is the contract pitch with a pronoun. The canonical branch now takes
Aside|itbefore the macOS 15+ floor and keeps its clause-start, negation and quoted-mention guards. Short forms without the floor still count only at a sentence start.Evidence
design-ui-focus-capture-39363705692.json(public native calls only), with a positive replay and a no-focus negative. New negative controls: a score in a different sentence from "design completeness", a score out of 7, a non-design completeness score, all-7 without a focus title, a non-leading, issue-labelled or bare "All 7" option. All of them still fail.test/plan-design-with-ui-fixture.test.ts28/28,test/third-party-actions.test.ts58/58,free-fixturesand touchfiles tests,typecheck, and thetypecheck:testratchet (none new) all pass. Both new regressions fail against main's detectors.plan-design-with-ui-scope5/5 (129, 106, 147, 153 and 127 s);tpa-absent-darwin5/5 (15–19 s, $0.41 total).Gate integrity: test-only detector edits. No threshold, trial count, case kind, quarantine or budget changed.