Skip to content

Conversation

@MengqinShen
Copy link
Contributor

…c evaluation support

Description here... Help the reviewer by:

  • linking to an issue that includes more details
  • if it's a new feature include samples of how to use the new feature
  • (optional if issue link is provided) if you fixed a bug include basic bug details

Checklist (if applicable):

@MengqinShen MengqinShen requested a review from yesudeep December 18, 2025 07:24
@github-actions github-actions bot added docs Improvements or additions to documentation feature New feature or request python Python config test labels Dec 18, 2025
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @MengqinShen, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request significantly enhances the Genkit Python library by integrating programmatic evaluation capabilities. It provides a new API for defining and executing evaluators against datasets, which is crucial for automated testing and quality assurance of AI models. The changes also include a practical demonstration of this feature and improvements to the robustness of the evaluation process's tracing mechanisms.

Highlights

  • Programmatic Evaluation API: Introduced a new evaluate async method in genkit.ai._aio.py which allows users to programmatically run evaluators against datasets, providing a streamlined way to assess model performance directly within code.
  • Evaluator Reference System: Added EvaluatorRef and evaluator_ref in genkit.blocks.evaluator.py to provide a structured way to reference and configure evaluators, enhancing modularity and reusability.
  • New Evaluator Demo: Included a new sample evaluator-demo under py/samples/ that showcases how to define a custom evaluator (substring_match) and run it programmatically using the new ai.evaluate() API.
  • Robust Tracing for Evaluation: Improved the eval_stepper_fn in genkit.ai._registry.py with a fallback mechanism to handle tracing infrastructure failures (e.g., in environments with NonRecordingSpans), ensuring evaluations can proceed even if tracing is not fully functional.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces programmatic evaluation support by adding a new ai.evaluate() method and an evaluator-demo sample. The changes look good overall, providing a solid foundation for evaluations. I've identified a potential bug in the error handling of the evaluation stepper function, where failures in non-tracing environments might be silently ignored. I've also left a few comments regarding type consistency and code cleanup. Once these points are addressed, this will be a great addition.

@MengqinShen MengqinShen self-assigned this Dec 18, 2025
@MengqinShen MengqinShen marked this pull request as ready for review December 18, 2025 08:15
@yesudeep yesudeep enabled auto-merge (squash) December 18, 2025 16:18
@yesudeep yesudeep merged commit 101cf3d into main Dec 18, 2025
10 checks passed
@yesudeep yesudeep deleted the elisa/feat/add-evaluator-sample-test branch December 18, 2025 16:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

config docs Improvements or additions to documentation feature New feature or request python Python test

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants