-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 169
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(userspace/libsinsp): avoid possible UB when calling back
or front
without checking string emptiness
#2088
Conversation
This UB was spotted by Falco zig CI: https://github.com/falcosecurity/falco/actions/runs/11106489185?pr=3307 /milestone 0.19.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you!
userspace/libsinsp/parsers.cpp
Outdated
@@ -2384,7 +2384,7 @@ std::string sinsp_parser::parse_dirfd(sinsp_evt *evt, std::string_view name, int | |||
return "<UNKNOWN>"; | |||
} | |||
|
|||
if(fdinfo->m_name.back() == '/') { | |||
if(!fdinfo->m_name.empty() && fdinfo->m_name.back() == '/') { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In both fixes, if m_name
is empty i return "/"
; perhaps it is better to just return the empty string?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Decided together with @jasondellaluce to just return an empty string in these cases.
/hold |
Perf diff from master - unit tests
Heap diff from master - unit tests
Heap diff from master - scap file
Benchmarks diff from master
|
…ont` without checking string emptiness. Signed-off-by: Federico Di Pierro <[email protected]>
bef6c42
to
8a0b548
Compare
/unhold |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2088 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 73.58% 73.58% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 253 253
Lines 31869 31869
Branches 5650 5644 -6
==========================================
- Hits 23452 23451 -1
+ Misses 8408 8393 -15
- Partials 9 25 +16
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/approve
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: FedeDP, jasondellaluce The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What type of PR is this?
/kind bug
Any specific area of the project related to this PR?
/area libsinsp
Does this PR require a change in the driver versions?
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: