-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
add Tormatic Black 600 as tested device #4819
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughThe documentation for the Tormatic and Novoferm cover platform has been updated. The compatibility note in the documentation now mentions that the component has been successfully tested with the Tormatic Black 600, in addition to the previously documented Novoferm 423. The advisory regarding compatibility with other models remains unchanged. No modifications were made to any exported or public entities. Changes
Tip ⚡💬 Agentic Chat (Pro Plan, General Availability)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
components/cover/tormatic.rst (1)
24-27
: Updated Tested Devices Note: The note now clearly indicates that the component was not only written and tested against Novoferm 423 but has also been verified with Tormatic Black 600. This meets the PR objective of adding Tormatic Black 600 as a tested device. For improved clarity, consider a minor rephrasing such as "if you confirm that this works on other models" rather than "if you confirm this to work on other models."
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
components/cover/tormatic.rst
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`**`: - Do not generate or add any sequence diagrams
**
: - Do not generate or add any sequence diagrams
components/cover/tormatic.rst
✅ Deploy Preview for esphome ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
Description:
add Tormatic Black 600 as tested device
Related issue (if applicable): fixes
Pull request in esphome with YAML changes (if applicable):
Checklist:
I am merging into
next
because this is new documentation that has a matching pull-request in esphome as linked above.or
I am merging into
current
because this is a fix, change and/or adjustment in the current documentation and is not for a new component or feature.Link added in
/components/index.rst
when creating new documents for new components or cookbook.