Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make it possible to use without nifs #13

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 28, 2023
Merged

Make it possible to use without nifs #13

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 28, 2023

Conversation

NelsonVides
Copy link
Collaborator

Solves #11

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (fa85c80) 91.90% compared to head (51b7d11) 91.90%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #13   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.90%   91.90%           
=======================================
  Files           5        5           
  Lines         321      321           
=======================================
  Hits          295      295           
  Misses         26       26           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@NelsonVides NelsonVides merged commit ade985d into master Dec 28, 2023
3 checks passed
@NelsonVides NelsonVides deleted the optional_nifs branch December 28, 2023 22:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants