Skip to content

Conversation

@abetomo
Copy link

@abetomo abetomo commented Oct 9, 2025

  • Fix the path to openarm.ros2_control.xacro.
  • Add a configuration example for bimanual.

GitHub issue: enactic/openarm_ros2#56

Thanks for the work, silenzio777!

* Fix the path to `openarm.ros2_control.xacro`.
* dd a configuration example for bimanual.
  * GitHub issue: enactic/openarm_ros2#56

Thanks for the work, silenzio777!

Co-authored-by: silenzio777 <[email protected]>
@kou kou requested review from Copilot and thomasonzhou October 9, 2025 02:10
Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR updates the Hardware Plugin Config section of the README to fix documentation issues and improve clarity for users. The changes correct file path references and provide better examples for bimanual robot configurations.

  • Corrected the file path reference to the hardware plugin configuration
  • Updated the hardware interface name in the existing example
  • Added a comprehensive bimanual configuration example

Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.

README.md Outdated
<hardware>
<plugin>openarm_mujoco_hardware/MujocoHardware</plugin>
<param name="prefix">left_</param>
<param name="websocket_port">1337</param>
Copy link

Copilot AI Oct 9, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The WebSocket port assignments appear to be swapped based on the explanation in line 43. The text states 'ports default to 1337 for right arm and 1338 for left arm', but the configuration shows left arm using 1337 and right arm using 1338.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Copy link
Collaborator

@thomasonzhou thomasonzhou left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

swapped port numbers, but functionally this does not change anything as they are just interfaces that can talk with any joint

@thomasonzhou
Copy link
Collaborator

It should be noted that this does not fully resolve the issue, since it is blocked by the merge of enactic/openarm_description#11

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants