-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
Update the Hardware Plugin Config section of the README #2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
* Fix the path to `openarm.ros2_control.xacro`. * dd a configuration example for bimanual. * GitHub issue: enactic/openarm_ros2#56 Thanks for the work, silenzio777! Co-authored-by: silenzio777 <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull Request Overview
This PR updates the Hardware Plugin Config section of the README to fix documentation issues and improve clarity for users. The changes correct file path references and provide better examples for bimanual robot configurations.
- Corrected the file path reference to the hardware plugin configuration
- Updated the hardware interface name in the existing example
- Added a comprehensive bimanual configuration example
Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.
README.md
Outdated
| <hardware> | ||
| <plugin>openarm_mujoco_hardware/MujocoHardware</plugin> | ||
| <param name="prefix">left_</param> | ||
| <param name="websocket_port">1337</param> |
Copilot
AI
Oct 9, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The WebSocket port assignments appear to be swapped based on the explanation in line 43. The text states 'ports default to 1337 for right arm and 1338 for left arm', but the configuration shows left arm using 1337 and right arm using 1338.
thomasonzhou
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
swapped port numbers, but functionally this does not change anything as they are just interfaces that can talk with any joint
|
It should be noted that this does not fully resolve the issue, since it is blocked by the merge of enactic/openarm_description#11 |
openarm.ros2_control.xacro.GitHub issue: enactic/openarm_ros2#56
Thanks for the work, silenzio777!