Added an update future, to be able to sync user code with interrupt #3199
+166
−1
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Need some help to fix the failing formatting test |
|
@smeenka You can run |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
For motor control with SimplePwm it would be nice that in user land it is possible to run code in sync with the Pwm.
For example to measure the motor current on a exact moment, and exact in phase with the Pwm signal.
So I added an UpdateFuture, to SimplePwm, making use of the already existing infrastructure (up_waker in State)
A test is added in stm32go named pwm_update_interrupt, to test the functionality
To be able to sync multiple timers, so they have all the same phase I also added a reset function to the SimplePwm.