Skip to content

Conversation

@cocktailpeanut
Copy link

The rebuilder has been using the hard-coded process.platform value as the platform attribute all this time.

This means, no matter what platform option you pass in, it would just use the current OS platform.

Basically, cross platform prebuild has not been working at all.

Combined with the electron-builder fix here cocktailpeanut/electron-builder@73f751b - now you can do cross platform electron builds that include prebuilt binaries.

The rebuilder has been using the hard-coded `process.platform` value as the platform attribute all this time.

This means, no matter what platform option you pass in, it would just use the current OS platform.

Basically, cross platform prebuild has not been working at all.

Combined with the electron-builder fix here cocktailpeanut/electron-builder@73f751b - now you can do cross platform electron builds that include prebuilt binaries.
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Mar 7, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 76.44%. Comparing base (29365ad) to head (ed1ca18).
Report is 58 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1072   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   76.44%   76.44%           
=======================================
  Files          19       19           
  Lines         692      692           
  Branches      134      135    +1     
=======================================
  Hits          529      529           
  Misses        118      118           
  Partials       45       45           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@MarshallOfSound MarshallOfSound left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is valid for prebuild modules but is invalid for modules powered via node-gyp. There should probably be checks in place to ensure that non-system-platform builds aren't even attempted for node-gyp builds

@erickzhao erickzhao self-assigned this Nov 7, 2023
@tmm1
Copy link

tmm1 commented Jun 22, 2025

Looks like this was resolved in #1153

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants