Skip to content

Conversation

@yetanothertw
Copy link
Contributor

@yetanothertw yetanothertw commented Oct 31, 2025

Adding more information to explain why single-document indexing in Serverless may appear to be slower than in an ECH environment.

Fixes #385.

Preview of the doc

The footnote:
image

image

…rless and ECH

Adding more information to explain why single-document indexing in Serverless may appear to be slower than in an ECH environment.

Fixes [#385](elastic/docs-content-internal#385).
@yetanothertw yetanothertw self-assigned this Oct 31, 2025
@yetanothertw yetanothertw changed the title Add footnote about the indexing performance differences between Serve… Add footnote about the indexing performance differences Oct 31, 2025
@yetanothertw yetanothertw added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation Team:Admin Issues owned by the Admin Docs Team labels Oct 31, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 31, 2025

@yetanothertw yetanothertw marked this pull request as ready for review October 31, 2025 16:52
@yetanothertw yetanothertw requested a review from a team as a code owner October 31, 2025 16:52
Copy link
Contributor

@kilfoyle kilfoyle left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! 🪴
Very nice!

Copy link
Collaborator

@shainaraskas shainaraskas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

added some feedback around the language. still could maybe tighten up the para a little maybe

re: reviewers, I'd ask @/tim-brooks + @/rjernst from the SDH linked in the issue.

Copy link
Collaborator

@shainaraskas shainaraskas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looking at the preview + the content size I might reverse myself on the footnote thing. the info looks quite chunky. good either way

@yetanothertw
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @rjernst and @Tim-Brooks, could you please review this small docs change as a follow-up to sdh-9350 to make sure that it captures your comments correctly?

Many thanks in advance! 🙏

@yetanothertw
Copy link
Contributor Author

looking at the preview + the content size I might reverse myself on the footnote thing. the info looks quite chunky. good either way

No worries, I thought it might be a bit much as well. I'll change it to a linked footnote this time.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation Team:Admin Issues owned by the Admin Docs Team

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants