chore: apply ruff semantics-preserving autofixes - #291
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Evidence
The complete pytest output includes the per-file term-missing table and the pytest-asyncio deprecation warning; the command exited 0. The diff was read hunk-by-hunk: it changes no string literal, no control flow, and no public signature. Optional annotations becoming PEP 604 unions are expected annotation-only changes; defaults and exception behavior are unchanged.
packages/**TypeScript is untouched. The two example files were authorized by firstmate:src/reasonsmith/examples/language_model_notices.py(UP035Callableimport) andsrc/reasonsmith/examples/recounted_reason_trace.py(RET501). The CI-ruleset cleanup produced no files outside the 43 already touched by the selected autofixes;git diff --name-onlybefore and after was unchanged.RUF100 was intentionally excluded because it would remove suppressions that remain load-bearing under other rule sets.