feat(obligations): get text as separate nodes

[ritankarsaha]

This PR fixes the issue #3116

• Now returns both text (legacy) and textNodes (array) fields
• API returns separate text nodes as array
• Frontend can now display obligation text as individual nodes

Closes #3116

Suggest Reviewer

@GMishx @amritkv

This is the entry in the couchdb now --

{
  "_id": "33d1fd9a922b183058ad4b494700a61e",
  "_rev": "1-5af712b377ae3d187971debb04f28d9d",
  "development": false,
  "textNodes": [
    "It is ensured that only analyzed Source Code is delivered and that the delivered binaries match  to the analyzed source code.",
    "Sw360 is a nice project  under Siemens"
  ],
  "issetBitfield": "0",
  "text": "It is ensured that only analyzed Source Code is delivered and that the delivered binaries match  to the analyzed source code.\nSw360 is a nice project  under Siemens",
  "whitelist": [],
  "obligationType": "OBLIGATION",
  "type": "obligation",
  "distribution": false,
  "title": "Analyzed source code matches the delivered binaries - 2",
  "obligationLevel": "COMPONENT_OBLIGATION"
}

Closes #3116

Checklist

Must:

• [x ] All related issues are referenced in commit messages and in PR

[ritankarsaha]

Hey @GMishx ig the tests are failing because multiple tests are trying to use the same couchdb database simultaneously. ig adding retry logic to the test cases would fix them... should i try adding them to the test-cases? As I had checked the build properly without the test cases earlier, also the db is also getting updated properly with everything running.

[ritankarsaha]

Hey @GMishx ig the tests are failing because multiple tests are trying to use the same couchdb database simultaneously. ig adding retry logic to the test cases would fix them... should i try adding them to the test-cases? As I had checked the build properly without the test cases earlier, also the db is also getting updated properly with everything running.

Hey @GMishx worked on this approach, added the retry logics, all the tests are now passing properly

Is there any better approach to this ?

[ritankarsaha]

@GMishx @amritkv , the build is now successful with all the tests. Could you please take a look and say if the approach is correct or not ?

[GMishx]

Hey @ritankarsaha , we went through the old code to understand how it was working. Let us have a discussion about the same during the GSoC sync call?

[ritankarsaha]

Hey @ritankarsaha , we went through the old code to understand how it was working. Let us have a discussion about the same during the GSoC sync call?

Yess yess suree @GMishx !!