Released 5.0.1

[dmatej]

• Finally releasing as 5.0.1, because there are no breaking changes, compared to 5.0.0.
• Old repositories are already removed, so we don't have to disable them
• Deployment is set correctly now, so we don't need most of the original cfg

[pzygielo]

• Finally releasing as 5.0.1, because there are no breaking changes, compared to 5.0.0.

But this:

• Cleanup in imports #279

by the happy accident of name collision, changed for example

old: parameter org.omg.CORBA.portable.InputStream org.omg.CORBA.LocalObject::_invoke(===org.omg.CORBA.portable.OutputStream===) throws org.omg.CORBA.portable.ApplicationException, org.omg.CORBA.portable.RemarshalException @ com.sun.corba.ee.impl.interceptors.CodecFactoryImpl
new: parameter java.io.InputStream org.omg.CORBA.LocalObject::_invoke(===java.io.OutputStream===) throws org.omg.CORBA.portable.ApplicationException, org.omg.CORBA.portable.RemarshalException @ com.sun.corba.ee.impl.interceptors.CodecFactoryImpl
java.method.parameterTypeChanged: The type of the parameter changed from 'org.omg.CORBA.portable.OutputStream' to 'java.io.OutputStream'.
SOURCE: POTENTIALLY_BREAKING, BINARY: BREAKING

I do not know how public this is

orb/omgapi/src/main/java/org/omg/CORBA/LocalObject.java

Lines 476 to 481 in 41c41d3

	*/
	public InputStream _invoke(OutputStream output)
	throws ApplicationException, RemarshalException
	{
	throw new org.omg.CORBA.NO_IMPLEMENT(reason);
	}

Looks like the one waiting to be implemented by extending class.

🤔

[pzygielo]

Perhaps those types should be restored and 5.0.2 released.

[dmatej]

Aaargh, I tried to check these names for sure manually, but with all those asterisks it was a hard task. Exactly the reason why to avoid asterisks.
Ok, I did not release 8.0.2 yet, I was going to do that now, because the TCK passed. So lets fix this first.