-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.2k
Avoid premature full binding of a receiver as a value in the process of binding possible type-or-value receiver (so-called “Color Color” scenario) #80978
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
716e35f
Avoid premature full binding of a receiver as a value in the process …
AlekseyTs 5dc8330
Implement Equals/GetHashCode for ObjectAddressLocalSymbol
AlekseyTs cc03680
Fixup
AlekseyTs 74d5976
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into Issue45739_2
AlekseyTs c667931
PR feedback
AlekseyTs 9960888
Clarify the purpose of asserts
AlekseyTs File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Some comments aren't visible on the classic Files Changed page.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
518 changes: 296 additions & 222 deletions
518
src/Compilers/CSharp/Portable/Binder/Binder_Expressions.cs
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
17 changes: 17 additions & 0 deletions
17
src/Compilers/CSharp/Portable/BoundTree/BoundBadExpression.cs
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ | ||
| // Licensed to the .NET Foundation under one or more agreements. | ||
| // The .NET Foundation licenses this file to you under the MIT license. | ||
| // See the LICENSE file in the project root for more information. | ||
|
|
||
| using System.Diagnostics; | ||
| using System.Linq; | ||
|
|
||
| namespace Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp | ||
| { | ||
| internal partial class BoundBadExpression | ||
| { | ||
| private partial void Validate() | ||
| { | ||
| Debug.Assert(!this.ChildBoundNodes.Any(c => Binder.IsTypeOrValueExpression(c) || Binder.IsMethodGroupWithTypeOrValueReceiver(c))); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } |
17 changes: 17 additions & 0 deletions
17
src/Compilers/CSharp/Portable/BoundTree/BoundConversion.cs
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ | ||
| // Licensed to the .NET Foundation under one or more agreements. | ||
| // The .NET Foundation licenses this file to you under the MIT license. | ||
| // See the LICENSE file in the project root for more information. | ||
|
|
||
| using System.Diagnostics; | ||
|
|
||
| namespace Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp | ||
| { | ||
| internal partial class BoundConversion | ||
| { | ||
| private partial void Validate() | ||
| { | ||
| Debug.Assert(!Binder.IsTypeOrValueExpression(Operand)); | ||
| Debug.Assert(!Binder.IsMethodGroupWithTypeOrValueReceiver(Operand)); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
17 changes: 17 additions & 0 deletions
17
src/Compilers/CSharp/Portable/BoundTree/BoundNameOfOperator.cs
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ | ||
| // Licensed to the .NET Foundation under one or more agreements. | ||
| // The .NET Foundation licenses this file to you under the MIT license. | ||
| // See the LICENSE file in the project root for more information. | ||
|
|
||
| using System.Diagnostics; | ||
|
|
||
| namespace Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp | ||
| { | ||
| internal partial class BoundNameOfOperator | ||
| { | ||
| private partial void Validate() | ||
| { | ||
| Debug.Assert(!Binder.IsTypeOrValueExpression(Argument)); | ||
| Debug.Assert(!Binder.IsMethodGroupWithTypeOrValueReceiver(Argument)); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } |
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Debug.Assert(typeOrValue.Type.Equals(boundValue.Type, TypeCompareKind.ConsiderEverything));(line 1973)Could the nullability of the value differ? For example
Color? Color = ...;theColorvalue would have typeColor?#ClosedThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Bound tree doesn't preserve top level nullability of types and we are binding simple identifiers. Perhaps nested nullability can somehow sneak in. Since this is an assert, I am not worried about this and I am comfortable going with a possibly too strong condition. We can relax it once the assert starts causing problems.