-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
- Loading branch information
Showing
2 changed files
with
110 additions
and
0 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@ | ||
| Project Committee Meeting - June 10, 2021, 12:00 PM ET | ||
|
|
||
| ATTENDEES: Shaun Walker (@sbwalker), Jeremy Sinclair (@snickler), John Callaway (@ovation22), Eriawan Kusumawardhono (@eriawan), Juan Elosegui (@jmelosegui), Scott Willhite (@mrswoop), Ken Cutt (@kencutt) | ||
|
|
||
| ABSENT: Chris Hammond (@ChrisHammond), Chris Sfanos (@ChrisSfanos), Jeff Strauss (@jstrauss), Claire Novotny (@clairernovotny), Tanner Gooding (@tannergooding) | ||
|
|
||
| STAFF OBSERVERS: Terracia King (@terraciaking) | ||
|
|
||
| AGENDA | ||
|
|
||
| 1. MONTHLY PROGRESS UPDATE | ||
|
|
||
| - HIBP project launched and created a big impact. | ||
| - @ovation22 action item to contact the project maintainer to confirm that he would still like to transfer the servicing of the HIBP project to the Foundation. | ||
| - the Board approved bUnit, AspNet oilerplate, and ASP.NET API Versioning projects | ||
| - the Board requested that the Project Committee review the NUKE project again | ||
| - activity metrics indicate this project is mature. | ||
| - project has a lot of activity | ||
| - similar to the CAKE project ( which is already a Foundation member ) | ||
| - Licensing check indicated that the project met the required criteria. | ||
| - the project maintainer from OpenMod inquired about the status of their project application | ||
| - licensing check revealed that their license is not permissive. | ||
| - the project maintainer stated that they would be willing to change the license to a permissive license. | ||
| - @sbwalker will stay in touch with the project maintainer for updates. | ||
|
|
||
| 2. REVIEW NEW PROJECT APPLICATIONS | ||
| - Arad SMS Gateway | ||
| - activity metrics indicate this project is very new. | ||
| - very little activity | ||
| - does not have many contributors. | ||
| - licensing check indicated that the project does not meet the Foundation criteria. | ||
| - Project Committee will not recommend the Arad SMS Gateway project to the Board for approval. | ||
| - NUKE | ||
| - The Project Committee reiterated their previous concerns that promoting alternative build systems can create challenges for .NET developers | ||
| - The Board feedback was that we should encourage a variety of solutions within the Foundation and .NET ecosystem which solve similar problems. | ||
| - @snickler stated that if NUKE is similar to the CAKE project, then there is nothing that should disqualify it as a member. | ||
| - Project Committee will recommend the NUKE project to the Board for approval. | ||
|
|
||
| 3. PROJECT | ||
|
|
||
| - Project Committee Budget | ||
| - @sbwalker held a discussion on the Projects Committee’s budget wish list. | ||
| - The following budget wish list items were identified: | ||
| - Provide Committee members with a @dotnetfoundation.org email address. | ||
| - Offer site hosting to project maintainers | ||
| - Offer Azure credits to Foundation projects. | ||
| - Develop automatic processes around project onboarding and tracking. | ||
| - Hold in-person events. | ||
| - Host Hack-a-thons to help gain more exposure to the Foundation’s projects. | ||
| - Offer prizes or giveaways for volunteers. | ||
| - Have a booth at 1-2 conferences throughout the year. | ||
| - Provide .NET Foundation’s swag as a welcome package for new project members | ||
|
|
||
| The meeting adjourned at 12:56 PM ET. |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@ | ||
| Project Committee Meeting - July 8, 2021, 12:00 PM ET | ||
|
|
||
| ATTENDEES: Shaun Walker (@sbwalker), Jeremy Sinclair (@snickler), Eriawan Kusumawardhono (@eriawan), Juan Elosegui (@jmelosegui), Scott Willhite (@mrswoop), Ken Cutt (@kencutt), Tanner Gooding (@tannergooding), Shawn Vause (@napalm684) | ||
|
|
||
| ABSENT: CChris Hammond (@ChrisHammond), Chris Sfanos (@ChrisSfanos), Jeff Strauss (@jstrauss), Claire Novotny (@clairernovotny) | ||
|
|
||
| STAFF OBSERVERS: Terracia King (@terraciaking) | ||
|
|
||
| AGENDA | ||
|
|
||
| 1. MONTHLY PROGRESS UPDATE | ||
|
|
||
| - Quiet momth | ||
| - The Board approved the NUKE project | ||
|
|
||
| 2. REVIEW NEW PROJECT APPLICATIONS | ||
| - ObjectStore | ||
| - activity metrics indicate this project is not mature | ||
| - limited activity | ||
| - licensing check indicated that the project does not have a permissive license. | ||
| - Project Committee will not recommend ObjectStore to the Board for approval at this time. | ||
| - Project Committee will follow up with project maintainer | ||
| - BrightChain | ||
| - activity metrics indicate the project is not mature | ||
| - limited activity | ||
| - licensing check revealed the license is not permissive. | ||
| - project maintainer stated that they would be willing to change the license to a permissive license. | ||
| - possible Seed Project if the license is changed. | ||
| - Project Committee will not recommend BrightChain to the Board for approval at this time. | ||
| - Project Committee will follow up with project maintainer | ||
| - MQTTnet | ||
| - activity metrics indicate this project is mature. | ||
| - a lot of activity and adoption | ||
| - Licensing check indicates the project meets the required criteria. | ||
| - Project Committee will recommend the MQTTnet project to the Board for approval. | ||
| - Arad Xmpp | ||
| - activity metrics indicate the project is not mature | ||
| - limited activity | ||
| - Only one contributor | ||
| - Licensing check indicates the project meets the required criteria. | ||
| - Does not have a release. | ||
| - Project Committee will not recommend the Arad Xmpp project to the Board for approval at this time. | ||
| - OpenMod | ||
| - Reviewed the OpenMod project last year and did not approve due to non-permissive licensing. | ||
| - The project maintainers recently changed the license to MIT. | ||
| - activity metrics indicate the project is mature | ||
| - lots of activity | ||
| - need to obtain legal guidance to determine risk factors of relicensing from EUPL to MIT | ||
|
|
||
| 3. PROJECT | ||
|
|
||
| - Code of Code Enforcement Plan | ||
| - @sbwalker held a discussion on the .NET Foundation Code of Conduct Enforcement document. | ||
| - @mrswoop action item to provide feedback to Claire Novotny on the Code of Conduct Enforcement document. | ||
|
|
||
| The meeting adjourned at 12:52 PM ET. |