Skip to content

chore: release main - #4037

Closed
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
release-please--branches--main
Closed

chore: release main#4037
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
release-please--branches--main

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actions github-actions Bot commented Aug 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🤖 I have created a release beep boop

franken-critique: 0.12.0

0.12.0 (2026-08-09)

Features

  • learning: add lesson effectiveness telemetry (#3803) (33ab5c1)

Performance

  • critique: bound ConcisenessEvaluator input memory and processing (#3657) (#3684) (b50d3bb)
franken-governor: 0.9.4

0.9.4 (2026-08-09)

Bug Fixes

  • governor: redact CLI approval prompt secrets (#3897) (5604f36)
franken-mcp-suite: 0.12.3

0.12.3 (2026-08-09)

Dependencies

  • The following workspace dependencies were updated
    • dependencies
      • @franken/critique bumped from 0.11.3 to 0.12.0
      • @franken/governor bumped from 0.9.3 to 0.9.4
      • @franken/orchestrator bumped from 0.61.1 to 0.61.2
@franken/orchestrator: 0.61.2

0.61.2 (2026-08-09)

Dependencies

  • The following workspace dependencies were updated
    • dependencies
      • @franken/critique bumped from 0.11.3 to 0.12.0
      • @franken/governor bumped from 0.9.3 to 0.9.4
0.68.0

0.68.0 (2026-08-09)

Features

  • learning: add lesson effectiveness telemetry (#3803) (33ab5c1)

Bug Fixes

  • governor: redact CLI approval prompt secrets (#3897) (5604f36)

Performance

  • critique: bound ConcisenessEvaluator input memory and processing (#3657) (#3684) (b50d3bb)

Documentation

  • tasks: record CLI stdin error lesson (81696aa)

CI/CD

  • deps: baseline better-sqlite3 type major gap (7907b5b)

This PR was generated with Release Please. See documentation.

@github-actions
github-actions Bot force-pushed the release-please--branches--main branch from a751970 to e7cf359 Compare August 2, 2026 22:23
@github-actions
github-actions Bot force-pushed the release-please--branches--main branch from e7cf359 to 57a77be Compare August 9, 2026 12:52
@djm204 djm204 closed this Aug 9, 2026
@djm204 djm204 reopened this Aug 9, 2026
@djm204

djm204 commented Aug 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@codex review

@djm204

djm204 commented Aug 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Closing this generated Release Please PR without merge because the immutable head 57a77be4d439b43f1d498e9526d8c51f404cd541 cannot satisfy the no-bypass exact-head CI gate.

Evidence:

  • I close/reopened the PR to force the previously missing pull_request CI run without changing the head.
  • Exact-head CI run https://github.com/djm204/frankenbeast/actions/runs/31315781366 failed in Dependency vulnerability SLA dashboard on five high findings: brace-expansion, fast-uri, ip-address, nanoid, and undici. No admin/bypass merge is permitted.
  • The other exact-head jobs passed: publish smoke, Codex CLI compatibility 0.143.0, and Codex CLI compatibility latest.
  • Isolated exact-head verification passed npm ci, build (10/10), typecheck (17/17), lint (10/10, zero errors), and release-version parity across package manifests, lockfile, and .release-please-manifest.json for 0.68.0, critique 0.12.0, governor 0.9.4, MCP suite 0.12.3, and orchestrator 0.61.2.
  • Fully paginated GraphQL review-thread audit returned hasNextPage=false, zero threads, and zero unresolved Codex threads before closure.

The release payload itself is mechanically consistent, but merging it while the required exact-head CI run is red would be a gate bypass. Release Please can regenerate a fresh release PR after the dependency baseline is remediated.

@djm204 djm204 closed this Aug 9, 2026
@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Delightful!

Reviewed commit: 57a77be4d4

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant