feat(#158): add metadata-aware secure retrieval layer for enterprise RAG - #201
Open
anshul23102 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
…or enterprise RAG Implement document-level access control in the RAG retrieval pipeline: - app/rag/secure_retrieval.py: Core secure retrieval module with: * SecureRetriever class with built-in access control enforcement * DocumentMetadata with tenant, role, and permission tracking * Four access levels: PUBLIC, INTERNAL, RESTRICTED, PRIVATE * Tenant isolation enforcement (strict cross-tenant blocking) * Role-based access control for restricted documents * Sensitive content filtering with permission checking * Metadata attachment for secure document indexing * Standalone filter function for post-retrieval filtering - tests/test_secure_retrieval.py: Comprehensive test suite with: * Tenant access control verification * Access level enforcement (PUBLIC, INTERNAL, RESTRICTED, PRIVATE) * Role-based filtering * Private document owner/admin access * Sensitive content permission checking * Multiple access scenarios Features: - Strict tenant isolation (prevents cross-tenant data leakage) - Role-based access control for document retrieval - Owner-only and admin-only document access - Sensitive content filtering (confidential, PII, health, financial) - Permission-based access to sensitive materials - Metadata attachment for secure document indexing - Integration with FAISS retrieval workflow Security benefits: - Application-level access control before context generation - Prevention of unauthorized document retrieval - Data isolation across tenants - Compliance with enterprise security requirements - Audit trail for access decisions Fixes devloperdevesh#158
|
@anshul23102 is attempting to deploy a commit to the devloperdevesh's projects Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
Author
|
Hi @devloperdevesh! 👋 I've completed the implementation for Issue #158 (Metadata-Aware Secure Retrieval Layer). What's Included
Key Features
Security Benefits
For ReviewWhen reviewing, you might consider these labels for GSSoC scoring:
Ready for review! 🚀 Contributed as part of GSSoC 2026 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Implement document-level access control in the RAG retrieval pipeline to prevent unauthorized access to sensitive documents based on tenant, role, and permission scope.
Problem
Current retrieval pipeline returns relevant document chunks without enforcing document-level access control. Enterprise environments require secure retrieval where users can only access documents allowed for their tenant, role, or permission scope. Without metadata-aware filtering, sensitive information may be exposed through RAG responses.
Solution
Implement metadata-aware retrieval layer with fine-grained access control:
Access Control Features:
Enforcement Strategy:
Implementation
Acceptance Criteria
Enterprise Security Benefits
Fixes #158
GSSoC 2026 Contribution