Skip to content

Expand Help section to include discussion of genAI #621

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

tobyhodges
Copy link
Member

This updates the existing section about how to get help, to include a discussion of generative AI. It is based on the changes made and discussed in swcarpentry/python-novice-gapminder#697 (and in various other communication channels -- please see the linked PR thread for more details)

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 29, 2025

Thank you!

Thank you for your pull request 😃

🤖 This automated message can help you check the rendered files in your submission for clarity. If you have any questions, please feel free to open an issue in {sandpaper}.

If you have files that automatically render output (e.g. R Markdown), then you should check for the following:

  • 🎯 correct output
  • 🖼️ correct figures
  • ❓ new warnings
  • ‼️ new errors

Rendered Changes

🔍 Inspect the changes: https://github.com/datacarpentry/python-ecology-lesson/compare/md-outputs..md-outputs-PR-621

The following changes were observed in the rendered markdown documents:

 00-before-we-start.md | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 md5sum.txt            |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
What does this mean?

If you have source files that require output and figures to be generated (e.g. R Markdown), then it is important to make sure the generated figures and output are reproducible.

This output provides a way for you to inspect the output in a diff-friendly manner so that it's easy to see the changes that occur due to new software versions or randomisation.

⏱️ Updated at 2025-04-29 14:12:01 +0000

@tobyhodges tobyhodges requested a review from carlosmr12 April 29, 2025 14:10
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant