forked from bitcoin/bitcoin
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
backport: Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#27302, 27334, 27425 #6689
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
vijaydasmp
wants to merge
2
commits into
dashpay:develop
Choose a base branch
from
vijaydasmp:May_2025_03
base: develop
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+187
−16
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
eefe569 bugfix: Fix incorrect debug.log config file path (Ryan Ofsky) 3746f00 init: Error if ignored bitcoin.conf file is found (Ryan Ofsky) 398c371 lint: Fix lint-format-strings false positives when format specifiers have argument positions (Ryan Ofsky) Pull request description: Show an error on startup if a bitcoin datadir that is being used contains a `bitcoin.conf` file that is ignored. There are two cases where this could happen: - One case reported in [bitcoin#27246 (comment)](bitcoin#27246 (comment)) happens when a `bitcoin.conf` file in the default datadir (e.g. `$HOME/.bitcoin/bitcoin.conf`) has a `datadir=/path` line that sets different datadir containing a second `bitcoin.conf` file. Currently the second `bitcoin.conf` file is ignored with no warning. - Another way this could happen is if a `-conf=` command line argument points to a configuration file with a `datadir=/path` line and that path contains a `bitcoin.conf` file, which is currently ignored. This change only adds an error message and doesn't change anything about way settings are applied. It also doesn't trigger errors if there are redundant `-datadir` or `-conf` settings pointing at the same configuration file, only if they are pointing at different files and one file is being ignored. ACKs for top commit: pinheadmz: re-ACK eefe569 willcl-ark: re-ACK eefe569 TheCharlatan: ACK eefe569 Tree-SHA512: 939a98a4b271b5263d64a2df3054c56fcde94784edf6f010d78693a371c38aa03138ae9cebb026b6164bbd898d8fd0845a61a454fd996e328fd7bcf51c580c2b
…e ctor for `prevector` bfb9291 util: implement prevector's move ctor & move assignment (Martin Leitner-Ankerl) fffc86f test: CScriptCheck is used a lot in std::vector, make sure that's efficient (Martin Leitner-Ankerl) 81f6797 util: prevector's move ctor and move assignment is `noexcept` (Martin Leitner-Ankerl) d380d28 bench: Add benchmark for prevector usage in std::vector (Martin Leitner-Ankerl) Pull request description: `prevector`'s move assignment and move constructor were not `noexcept`, which makes it inefficient to use inside STL containers like `std::vector`. That's the case e.g. for `CScriptCheck`. This PR adds `noexcept`, and also implements the move assignment & ctor, which makes it quite a bit more efficient to use prevector in an std::vector. The PR also adds a benchmark which grows an `std::vector` by adding `prevector` objects to it. merge-base: | ns/op | op/s | err% | ins/op | cyc/op | IPC | bra/op | miss% | total | benchmark |--------------------:|--------------------:|--------:|----------------:|----------------:|-------:|---------------:|--------:|----------:|:---------- | 6,440.29 | 155,272.42 | 0.2% | 40,713.01 | 20,473.84 | 1.989 | 7,132.01 | 0.2% | 0.44 | `PrevectorFillVectorDirectNontrivial` | 3,213.19 | 311,217.35 | 0.7% | 35,373.01 | 10,214.07 | 3.463 | 6,945.00 | 0.2% | 0.43 | `PrevectorFillVectorDirectTrivial` | 34,749.70 | 28,777.23 | 0.1% | 364,396.05 | 110,521.94 | 3.297 | 78,568.37 | 0.1% | 0.43 | `PrevectorFillVectorIndirectNontrivial` | 32,535.05 | 30,736.09 | 0.4% | 353,823.31 | 103,464.53 | 3.420 | 79,871.80 | 0.2% | 0.40 | `PrevectorFillVectorIndirectTrivial` util: prevector's move ctor and move assignment is `noexcept`: | ns/op | op/s | err% | ins/op | cyc/op | IPC | bra/op | miss% | total | benchmark |--------------------:|--------------------:|--------:|----------------:|----------------:|-------:|---------------:|--------:|----------:|:---------- | 6,603.87 | 151,426.40 | 0.2% | 23,734.01 | 21,009.63 | 1.130 | 2,445.01 | 0.3% | 0.44 | `PrevectorFillVectorDirectNontrivial` | 1,980.93 | 504,813.15 | 0.1% | 13,784.00 | 6,304.32 | 2.186 | 2,258.00 | 0.3% | 0.44 | `PrevectorFillVectorDirectTrivial` | 19,110.54 | 52,327.15 | 0.1% | 139,816.41 | 51,987.72 | 2.689 | 28,512.18 | 0.1% | 0.43 | `PrevectorFillVectorIndirectNontrivial` | 12,334.37 | 81,074.27 | 0.7% | 125,655.12 | 39,253.58 | 3.201 | 27,854.46 | 0.2% | 0.44 | `PrevectorFillVectorIndirectTrivial` util: implement prevector's move ctor & move assignment | ns/op | op/s | err% | ins/op | cyc/op | IPC | bra/op | miss% | total | benchmark |--------------------:|--------------------:|--------:|----------------:|----------------:|-------:|---------------:|--------:|----------:|:---------- | 5,262.66 | 190,018.01 | 0.2% | 20,157.01 | 16,745.26 | 1.204 | 2,445.01 | 0.3% | 0.44 | `PrevectorFillVectorDirectNontrivial` | 1,687.07 | 592,744.35 | 0.2% | 12,742.00 | 5,368.02 | 2.374 | 2,258.00 | 0.3% | 0.44 | `PrevectorFillVectorDirectTrivial` | 17,930.80 | 55,769.95 | 0.1% | 136,237.69 | 47,903.31 | 2.844 | 28,512.02 | 0.2% | 0.42 | `PrevectorFillVectorIndirectNontrivial` | 11,893.75 | 84,077.78 | 0.2% | 126,182.02 | 37,852.91 | 3.333 | 28,152.01 | 0.1% | 0.44 | `PrevectorFillVectorIndirectTrivial` As can be seen, mostly thanks to just `noexcept` the benchmark becomes about 2 times faster because `std::vector` can now use move operations instead of having to fall back to copy everything I had a look at how this change affects the other benchmarks, and they are all pretty much the same, the only noticable difference is `CCheckQueueSpeedPrevectorJob` goes from 364.56ns down to 346.21ns. ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK bfb9291 jonatack: > Tested Approach ACK [bfb9291](bitcoin@bfb9291), ~ACK modulo re-verifying the implementation of the last commit. john-moffett: Approach ACK bfb9291 theStack: Tested and light code-review ACK bfb9291 Tree-SHA512: 242995d7cb2f8ebfa73177aa690a505f189d91edeb8cea3e34a41ca507c8cb17c65fe2a4e196fdafc5c6e89b2b2222627bfc9f5c316517de0857b7b5e9c58225
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Bitcoin Backports