Skip to content

Correcting .NET examples in the workflow docs #4627

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: v1.15
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

WhitWaldo
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for helping make the Dapr documentation better!

Please follow this checklist before submitting:

  • Commits are signed with Developer Certificate of Origin (DCO - learn more)
  • Read the contribution guide
  • Commands include options for Linux, MacOS, and Windows within codetabs
  • New file and folder names are globally unique
  • Page references use shortcodes instead of markdown or URL links
  • Images use HTML style and have alternative text
  • Places where multiple code/command options are given have codetabs

In addition, please fill out the following to help reviewers understand this pull request:

Description

Following in the steps of past PRs, I'm submitting a few tiny changes to the .NET examples in the workflow documentation that should be corrected for greater clarity and to put forward ideas of how things should be done in the "real world". My hope is that by being clear about this in the examples, we can avoid assuming that developers would "just know" that toy examples aren't actually following best practices and teach them from example how to properly do everything from the get-go.

Issue reference

@WhitWaldo WhitWaldo self-assigned this Apr 24, 2025
@WhitWaldo WhitWaldo requested review from a team as code owners April 24, 2025 04:11
Copy link
Member

@msfussell msfussell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants