Add ISC Contradiction Gate to Algorithm OBSERVE phase#1025
Open
jaredstanko wants to merge 1 commit intodanielmiessler:mainfrom
Open
Add ISC Contradiction Gate to Algorithm OBSERVE phase#1025jaredstanko wants to merge 1 commit intodanielmiessler:mainfrom
jaredstanko wants to merge 1 commit intodanielmiessler:mainfrom
Conversation
Adds a mandatory validation gate that cross-references every ISC criterion against the user's explicit guidance before proceeding from OBSERVE to THINK. This prevents the AI from generating criteria that contradict what the user explicitly said they don't want. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Problem
The Algorithm's OBSERVE phase generates ISC criteria and validates them for atomicity (Splitting Test) and quantity (Count Gate), but never checks whether criteria contradict what the user explicitly said they don't want.
In production, this caused the AI to:
The AI rationalized the exception ("the Ubuntu image is different from tool versions") instead of following the explicit instruction.
Solution
A new mandatory gate after ISC Count Gate:
Key design choice: the gate explicitly calls out rationalization ("but this one is different") as the failure mode, because that's exactly what happened in production.
Test plan
🤖 Generated with Claude Code