Local feature and ssl setup #12
Conversation
Co-authored-by: ezcyser <[email protected]>
|
Cursor Agent can help with this pull request. Just |
Summary of ChangesHello @cyserman, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request establishes a secure and structured methodology for developers to integrate and test features from other pull requests, specifically addressing the challenges of secrets management and isolated testing. It provides both an automated script and a detailed manual guide to ensure that new features, especially those involving sensitive data or SSL configurations, can be safely pulled, tested locally, and integrated without compromising security or code integrity. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a helpful script and documentation for safely integrating changes from other pull requests, which is a great initiative for improving the development workflow and security. My review focuses on making the script and documentation more robust and reusable. I've pointed out a few places where hardcoded values could be replaced with dynamic ones, which will make these tools more flexible for future use. I've also suggested improvements to the git commands in both the script and the markdown file to handle different scenarios gracefully and to be more efficient. Overall, these are valuable additions, and addressing the feedback will make them even more powerful for developers.
| if git merge "$PR9_REMOTE_BRANCH" --no-edit; then | ||
| echo -e "${GREEN}✅ PR9 merged successfully${NC}" | ||
| else | ||
| echo -e "${RED}❌ Merge conflicts detected. Resolve them manually.${NC}" | ||
| echo "After resolving:" | ||
| echo " git add ." | ||
| echo " git commit" | ||
| exit 1 | ||
| fi |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The prompt at line 43 suggests that a user can enter a pull request ref like pull/9/head. However, the git merge command on line 47 will fail for such a ref because it needs to be fetched explicitly first. The current error message about merge conflicts would be misleading. The script should handle PR refs gracefully to be more robust.
| if git merge "$PR9_REMOTE_BRANCH" --no-edit; then | |
| echo -e "${GREEN}✅ PR9 merged successfully${NC}" | |
| else | |
| echo -e "${RED}❌ Merge conflicts detected. Resolve them manually.${NC}" | |
| echo "After resolving:" | |
| echo " git add ." | |
| echo " git commit" | |
| exit 1 | |
| fi | |
| if ! git merge "$PR9_REMOTE_BRANCH" --no-edit 2>/dev/null; then | |
| echo -e "${YELLOW}Standard merge failed. Trying to fetch as a PR ref...${NC}" | |
| if git fetch origin "$PR9_REMOTE_BRANCH" && git merge FETCH_HEAD --no-edit; then | |
| echo -e "${GREEN}✅ PR9 merged successfully as a PR ref.${NC}" | |
| else | |
| echo -e "${RED}❌ Merge failed. This could be due to merge conflicts or an invalid branch/ref name.${NC}" | |
| echo "After resolving, run 'git commit' and continue manually." | |
| exit 1 | |
| fi | |
| else | |
| echo -e "${GREEN}✅ PR9 merged successfully${NC}" | |
| fi |
| echo " npm run dev" | ||
| echo "" | ||
| echo "3. Once tested, merge to your feature branch:" | ||
| echo " git checkout cursor/local-feature-and-ssl-setup-cec2" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The feature branch name cursor/local-feature-and-ssl-setup-cec2 is hardcoded. This prevents the script from being reusable for other feature branches. It's better to capture the user's current branch at the beginning of the script and use that variable in these instructions.
For example, you can add this after the git status check (e.g., around line 26):
ORIGINAL_BRANCH=$(git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD)Then, you can use $ORIGINAL_BRANCH here.
| echo " git checkout cursor/local-feature-and-ssl-setup-cec2" | |
| echo " git checkout $ORIGINAL_BRANCH" |
| ### Step 1: Save Current Work | ||
| ```bash | ||
| # Make sure you're on your feature branch | ||
| git checkout cursor/local-feature-and-ssl-setup-cec2 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The branch name cursor/local-feature-and-ssl-setup-cec2 is hardcoded. This document would be more helpful and reusable if it used a placeholder like <your-feature-branch>. This hardcoded name appears in multiple places in this file (lines 97, 176, 225).
| git checkout cursor/local-feature-and-ssl-setup-cec2 | |
| git checkout <your-feature-branch> |
| ### Step 3: Create Local PR9 Test Branch | ||
| ```bash | ||
| # Create branch from main | ||
| git checkout -b local/pr9-test main |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The manual guide uses a fixed branch name local/pr9-test. This could lead to conflicts if a branch with this name already exists. The automated script creates a unique branch name with a timestamp, which is a safer approach. It's recommended to follow a similar practice in the manual steps to ensure the branch name is unique.
| git checkout -b local/pr9-test main | |
| # Create a unique branch name, e.g., by adding a timestamp | |
| git checkout -b local/pr9-test-$(date +%s) main |
| git show HEAD --name-only | grep -i ssl | ||
| git show HEAD --name-only | grep -i cert |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
These two grep commands can be combined into a single, more efficient command using an extended regular expression (-E).
| git show HEAD --name-only | grep -i ssl | |
| git show HEAD --name-only | grep -i cert | |
| git show HEAD --name-only | grep -iE 'ssl|cert' |
| # Step 7: Check for .env file and guide user | ||
| echo "" | ||
| echo -e "${YELLOW}Step 7: Environment Setup${NC}" | ||
| ENV_FILE="09_APP/prose-legal-db-app/.env" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The path 09_APP/prose-legal-db-app/.env is hardcoded. This makes the script brittle to project structure changes. It would be more robust to find the path to .env.example dynamically and derive the path to .env from it. You could use find for this:
# Find the directory containing .env.example
APP_DIR=$(dirname $(find . -name ".env.example" -not -path "*/node_modules/*" -print -quit))
if [ -n "$APP_DIR" ]; then
ENV_FILE="$APP_DIR/.env"
# ... continue with logic
else
echo "Could not find .env.example"
fi
Pull Request
Description
This PR introduces a safe and guided process for integrating new features and secrets (like API keys) from a pull request (e.g., PR9) into a local development environment. It provides both an automated script and a detailed manual guide to ensure proper secrets management, isolated testing, and consideration for SSL setup before merging.
The primary goal is to enable developers to pull and test new features that rely on sensitive information without compromising security by accidentally committing secrets.
Type of Change
Testing
Test Results
The changes include a shell script (
pull-pr9-safely.sh) and a markdown guide (PR9_MERGE_RECOMMENDATION.md). The script is designed to be run by the user to facilitate testing of the target PR (PR9). The AI verified the creation and content of these files.Checklist
pull-pr9-safely.sh)PR9_MERGE_RECOMMENDATION.mdfile is the documentation)CI Status
Security
Related Issues
Closes #
Screenshots (if applicable)
Artifacts to Attach
PR9_MERGE_RECOMMENDATION.mdas a guide)Safety & Backup Rules
backups/YYYYMMDD-HHMMSSAdditional Notes
The
pull-pr9-safely.shscript is designed to be run locally by the developer. It will prompt for the PR9 branch name and guide through the process of merging, secrets handling, and testing.