scikit-learn: Refactor section to dedicated page #311
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@amotl has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 19 minutes and 36 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
WalkthroughAdds a new scikit-learn integration docs page, links it in the integrations toctree, and simplifies the ML topic page by replacing the embedded scikit-learn content with a seealso link to the new page and removing related external references. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
docs/integrate/scikit-learn/index.md (2)
14-17: Nit: capitalize “Matplotlib”Minor brand/style fix.
-[scikit-learn], built on NumPy, SciPy, and matplotlib, is an open-source +[scikit-learn], built on NumPy, SciPy, and Matplotlib, is an open-source
4-9: Prefer local logo assets over hotlinkingAvoid external hotlinks to ensure reliability, faster builds, and licensing clarity. Store logos under
_static/logos/(or your assets dir) and reference them locally. Optional: addloading=lazyfor images.-:style: "float: right; margin-left: 1em" -[{w=180px}][scikit-learn] - -[{w=180px}][pandas] +:style: "float: right; margin-left: 1em" +[{width=180px loading=lazy}][scikit-learn] + +[{width=180px loading=lazy}][pandas]Please confirm the chosen assets path and that the SVGs exist in the repo so RTD doesn’t 404.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
docs/integrate/index.md(1 hunks)docs/integrate/scikit-learn/index.md(1 hunks)docs/topic/ml/index.md(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
docs/integrate/index.md (1)
65-66: Toctree entry looks correct; ensure it renders in navPlacement is alphabetically consistent and the relative path matches the new page. Please verify the preview build shows “scikit-learn” under Integrations between RisingWave and SQL Server.
docs/integrate/scikit-learn/index.md (2)
1-2: Anchor and title LGTMThe
(scikit-learn)label aligns with downstream{ref}usage.
32-35: Quick link checkPlease sanity‑check that all three blog URLs are still live in the preview build.
docs/topic/ml/index.md (1)
228-231: Good consolidation with seealsoThe cross‑link keeps ML topic concise. Please verify
{ref}resolves to the new(scikit-learn)anchor.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
docs/topic/ml/index.md (1)
68-71: PyCaret seealso points to TensorFlow — likely a copy/paste error.Header says “PyCaret” but the link targets
{ref}tensorflow``. Suggest pointing to a PyCaret page/label if it exists.Apply this diff:
-:::{seealso} -See the dedicated page: {ref}`tensorflow`. -::: +:::{seealso} +See the dedicated page: {ref}`pycaret`. +:::If there isn’t a dedicated PyCaret page yet, either adjust the header to “TensorFlow” or create the PyCaret page and add a
(pycaret)=label to match the{ref}.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
docs/integrate/index.md(1 hunks)docs/integrate/scikit-learn/index.md(1 hunks)docs/topic/ml/index.md(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- docs/integrate/index.md
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- docs/integrate/scikit-learn/index.md
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: Build docs
| :::{seealso} | ||
| Please navigate to the dedicated page about {ref}`scikit-learn`. | ||
| ::: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
Refactor to dedicated scikit-learn page looks good; verify cross‑ref target exists.
The minimal seealso is consistent with the new structure. Please confirm that the new integration page defines a label matching {ref} usage (e.g., a top‑of‑page (scikit-learn)= anchor) and that it’s included in the integrations toctree to avoid a broken link.
Run to verify label and TOC wiring:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
# 1) Check the scikit-learn page exists
fd -t f 'index.md' docs/integrate/scikit-learn
# 2) Check it defines the expected label at top of the page
rg -n '^\(scikit-learn\)=' docs/integrate/scikit-learn/index.md || {
echo "Missing (scikit-learn)= label in docs/integrate/scikit-learn/index.md"; exit 1; }
# 3) Check the integrations index references the page (path-based inclusion)
rg -n 'integrate/scikit-learn/index' docs/integrate/index.md || {
echo "Missing scikit-learn entry in docs/integrate/index.md"; exit 1; }
# 4) (Optional) Sphinx linkcheck in CI would catch this tooLength of output: 108
Add scikit-learn entry to integrations TOC
docs/integrate/scikit-learn/index.md defines (scikit-learn)=, but docs/integrate/index.md does not reference the page — add an entry (e.g. integrate/scikit-learn/index) to the integrations toctree so the {ref} resolves.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In docs/topic/ml/index.md around lines 102 to 104, the {ref}`scikit-learn`
target is unresolved because docs/integrate/index.md does not include an entry
for the scikit-learn integration; open docs/integrate/index.md and add the
integration toctree entry (for example integrate/scikit-learn/index) so the
integrations TOC includes the scikit-learn page and the {ref} resolves.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@coderabbitai: I think your assessment is wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
@amotl, let me verify the current state of the integration setup to provide an accurate assessment.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
# Let's carefully examine the current state
echo "=== Checking if scikit-learn integration page exists ==="
ls -la docs/integrate/scikit-learn/index.md
echo "=== Checking the scikit-learn page for the label ==="
head -10 docs/integrate/scikit-learn/index.md
echo "=== Checking the integrations index content ==="
cat docs/integrate/index.md
echo "=== Searching for scikit-learn references in the integrations index ==="
rg -n -i "scikit" docs/integrate/index.md || echo "No matches found"
Length of output: 2114
@amotl, you're absolutely right, and I apologize for the incorrect assessment.
Looking at the script output, I can see that:
- The scikit-learn integration page exists at
docs/integrate/scikit-learn/index.md - The page properly defines the label
(scikit-learn)=at the top - The integrations index includes the entry - line 68 in
docs/integrate/index.mdshowsscikit-learn/indexin the toctree
The {ref}scikit-learn`` reference should resolve correctly since all the necessary components are in place. My original analysis was flawed, and the refactor is properly implemented. Thank you for the correction!
(\ /)
( ._.)
o_(")(")
sheepish rabbit
1 participant
About
Just a bit of refactoring.
Preview
References
/cc @seut