Skip to content

[associative.reqmts.general] Eliminate the final usage of “multiple keys” #7874

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 14, 2025

Conversation

xmcgcg
Copy link
Contributor

@xmcgcg xmcgcg commented May 14, 2025

Associative containers possibly containing multiple elements for each key are said to support “equivalent keys”, but there is one place in [containers] that uses the term “multiple keys”. We should eliminate that.

Copy link
Member

@jwakely jwakely left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, this is the correct terminology as defined in [associative.reqmts.general].

@jensmaurer jensmaurer merged commit e8a5d8b into cplusplus:main May 14, 2025
0 of 2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants