Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix linalg conj ADL wording #7497

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 17, 2024
Merged

Fix linalg conj ADL wording #7497

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 17, 2024

Conversation

mhoemmen
Copy link
Contributor

@mhoemmen mhoemmen commented Dec 17, 2024

@tkoeppe @jwakely Per our offline discussion

Fixes #7494.

@tkoeppe @jwakely Per our offline discussion
@tkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

tkoeppe commented Dec 17, 2024

@jensmaurer for sanity checking?

Copy link
Member

@jensmaurer jensmaurer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks ok.

@tkoeppe tkoeppe merged commit f3676cb into cplusplus:main Dec 17, 2024
2 checks passed
@mhoemmen
Copy link
Contributor Author

mhoemmen commented Dec 19, 2024

Thankfully, this is how we spelled it in P3050R3. On the other hand, R3 takes a slightly different wording tack, to speak of "is valid" rather than "is not valid."

@mhoemmen mhoemmen deleted the patch-1 branch December 19, 2024 17:35
@jwakely
Copy link
Member

jwakely commented Dec 20, 2024

On the other hand, R3 takes a slightly different wording tack, to speak of "is valid" rather than "is not valid."

See #7506

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[linalg.helpers] too many T
4 participants