Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: allow scaling of trusting period for client upgrades #8185

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
31 changes: 28 additions & 3 deletions modules/light-clients/07-tendermint/upgrade.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -2,8 +2,10 @@ package tendermint

import (
"fmt"
"time"

errorsmod "cosmossdk.io/errors"
sdkmath "cosmossdk.io/math"
storetypes "cosmossdk.io/store/types"
upgradetypes "cosmossdk.io/x/upgrade/types"

@@ -17,8 +19,10 @@ import (
)

// VerifyUpgradeAndUpdateState checks if the upgraded client has been committed by the current client
// It will zero out all client-specific fields (e.g. TrustingPeriod) and verify all data
// in client state that must be the same across all valid Tendermint clients for the new chain.
// It will zero out all client-specific fields and verify all data in client state that must
// be the same across all valid Tendermint clients for the new chain.
// Note, if there is a decrease in the UnbondingPeriod, then the TrustingPeriod, despite being a client-specific field
// is scaled down by the same ratio.
// VerifyUpgrade will return an error if:
// - the upgradedClient is not a Tendermint ClientState
// - the latest height of the client state does not have the same revision number or has a greater
@@ -93,12 +97,17 @@ func (cs ClientState) VerifyUpgradeAndUpdateState(
return errorsmod.Wrapf(err, "consensus state proof failed. Path: %s", upgradeConsStatePath.GetKeyPath())
}

trustingPeriod := cs.TrustingPeriod
if tmUpgradeClient.UnbondingPeriod < cs.UnbondingPeriod {
trustingPeriod = calculateNewTrustingPeriod(trustingPeriod, cs.UnbondingPeriod, tmUpgradeClient.UnbondingPeriod)
}

// Construct new client state and consensus state
// Relayer chosen client parameters are ignored.
// All chain-chosen parameters come from committed client, all client-chosen parameters
// come from current client.
newClientState := NewClientState(
tmUpgradeClient.ChainId, cs.TrustLevel, cs.TrustingPeriod, tmUpgradeClient.UnbondingPeriod,
tmUpgradeClient.ChainId, cs.TrustLevel, trustingPeriod, tmUpgradeClient.UnbondingPeriod,
cs.MaxClockDrift, tmUpgradeClient.LatestHeight, tmUpgradeClient.ProofSpecs, tmUpgradeClient.UpgradePath,
)

@@ -165,3 +174,19 @@ func constructUpgradeConsStateMerklePath(upgradePath []string, lastHeight export

return commitmenttypes.NewMerklePath(consStateKey...)
}

// calculateNewTrustingPeriod converts the provided durations to decimal representation to avoid floating-point precision issues
// and calculates the new trusting period, decreasing it by the ratio between the original and new unbonding period.
func calculateNewTrustingPeriod(trustingPeriod, originalUnbonding, newUnbonding time.Duration) time.Duration {
origUnbondingDec := sdkmath.LegacyNewDec(originalUnbonding.Nanoseconds())
newUnbondingDec := sdkmath.LegacyNewDec(newUnbonding.Nanoseconds())
trustingPeriodDec := sdkmath.LegacyNewDec(trustingPeriod.Nanoseconds())

// compute decrease ratio: (originalUnbonding - newUnbonding) / originalUnbonding
decreaseRatio := origUnbondingDec.Sub(newUnbondingDec).Quo(origUnbondingDec)

// compute new trusting period: trustingPeriod * (1 - decreaseRatio)
newTrustingPeriodDec := trustingPeriodDec.Mul(sdkmath.LegacyOneDec().Sub(decreaseRatio))
Comment on lines +186 to +189
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Isn't it much simpler to just do:

newTrustingPeriodDec := trustingPeeriodDec.Mul(newUnbondingDec).Quo(origUnbondingDec)

This is equivalent to what you have if I'm not mistaken

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lol, yes, I think they are equivalent. Happy to use this if you find it more readable. I can update!


return time.Duration(newTrustingPeriodDec.TruncateInt64()) * time.Nanosecond
}
33 changes: 33 additions & 0 deletions modules/light-clients/07-tendermint/upgrade_test.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ package tendermint_test

import (
"errors"
"time"

upgradetypes "cosmossdk.io/x/upgrade/types"

@@ -86,6 +87,38 @@ func (suite *TendermintTestSuite) TestVerifyUpgrade() {
},
expErr: nil,
},
{
name: "successful upgrade scales trusting period with unbonding period decrease",
setup: func() {
newUnbondingPeriod := time.Hour * 24 * 7 * 2
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lemme know if you want a dedicated test func to perform assertions on new trusting period.
This test case covers the code but doesn't do strict assertions.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it would be good to assert the new trusting period is what we expect

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agree, I'll add a separate test func for this. Will try to get around to it tomorrow or so

upgradedClient = ibctm.NewClientState(suite.chainB.ChainID, ibctm.DefaultTrustLevel, trustingPeriod, newUnbondingPeriod, maxClockDrift, clienttypes.NewHeight(clienttypes.ParseChainID(suite.chainB.ChainID), upgradedClient.(*ibctm.ClientState).LatestHeight.GetRevisionHeight()+10), commitmenttypes.GetSDKSpecs(), upgradePath)
upgradedClient = upgradedClient.(*ibctm.ClientState).ZeroCustomFields()
upgradedClientBz, err = clienttypes.MarshalClientState(suite.chainA.App.AppCodec(), upgradedClient)
suite.Require().NoError(err)

// upgrade Height is at next block
lastHeight = clienttypes.NewHeight(0, uint64(suite.chainB.GetContext().BlockHeight()+1))

// zero custom fields and store in upgrade store
suite.chainB.GetSimApp().UpgradeKeeper.SetUpgradedClient(suite.chainB.GetContext(), int64(lastHeight.GetRevisionHeight()), upgradedClientBz) //nolint:errcheck // ignore error for test
suite.chainB.GetSimApp().UpgradeKeeper.SetUpgradedConsensusState(suite.chainB.GetContext(), int64(lastHeight.GetRevisionHeight()), upgradedConsStateBz) //nolint:errcheck // ignore error for test

// commit upgrade store changes and update clients

suite.coordinator.CommitBlock(suite.chainB)
err := path.EndpointA.UpdateClient()
suite.Require().NoError(err)

cs, found := suite.chainA.App.GetIBCKeeper().ClientKeeper.GetClientState(suite.chainA.GetContext(), path.EndpointA.ClientID)
suite.Require().True(found)
tmCs, ok := cs.(*ibctm.ClientState)
suite.Require().True(ok)

upgradedClientProof, _ = suite.chainB.QueryUpgradeProof(upgradetypes.UpgradedClientKey(int64(lastHeight.GetRevisionHeight())), tmCs.LatestHeight.GetRevisionHeight())
upgradedConsensusStateProof, _ = suite.chainB.QueryUpgradeProof(upgradetypes.UpgradedConsStateKey(int64(lastHeight.GetRevisionHeight())), tmCs.LatestHeight.GetRevisionHeight())
},
expErr: nil,
},
{
name: "unsuccessful upgrade: upgrade path not set",
setup: func() {