Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Version Packages #964

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 10, 2025
Merged

Version Packages #964

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 10, 2025

Conversation

ct-changesets[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@ct-changesets ct-changesets bot commented Mar 6, 2025

This PR was opened by the Changesets release GitHub action. When you're ready to do a release, you can merge this and the packages will be published to npm automatically. If you're not ready to do a release yet, that's fine, whenever you add more changesets to master, this PR will be updated.

Releases

@commercetools/[email protected]

Minor Changes

  • #963 1c731e1 Thanks @ct-sdks! - Api changes

    Added Type(s)
    • added type BusinessUnitAssociateResponse
Added Resource(s)
  • added resource /{projectKey}/business-units/key={key}/associates/{associateId}
  • added resource /{projectKey}/business-units/{businessUnitId}/associates/{associateId}
  • added resource /{projectKey}/in-store/key={storeKey}/business-units/key={key}/associates/{associateId}
  • added resource /{projectKey}/in-store/key={storeKey}/business-units/{businessUnitId}/associates/{associateId}
Added Method(s)
  • added method apiRoot.withProjectKey().businessUnits().keyWithKeyValueAssociatesWithAssociateIdValue().get()
  • added method apiRoot.withProjectKey().businessUnits().withBusinessUnitIdValueAssociatesWithAssociateIdValue().get()
  • added method apiRoot.withProjectKey().inStoreKeyWithStoreKeyValue().businessUnits().keyWithKeyValueAssociatesWithAssociateIdValue().get()
  • added method apiRoot.withProjectKey().inStoreKeyWithStoreKeyValue().businessUnits().withBusinessUnitIdValueAssociatesWithAssociateIdValue().get()
MarkDeprecated Property(s)
  • marked property CountOnCustomLineItemUnits::excludeCount as deprecated
  • marked property CountOnLineItemUnits::excludeCount as deprecated

@ct-changesets ct-changesets bot requested a review from a team as a code owner March 6, 2025 16:08
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 6, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.73%. Comparing base (8e0dd35) to head (6085def).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #964   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.73%   96.73%           
=======================================
  Files         112      112           
  Lines        2145     2145           
  Branches      633      633           
=======================================
  Hits         2075     2075           
  Misses         63       63           
  Partials        7        7           
Flag Coverage Δ
-coverage 96.73% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@ct-changesets ct-changesets bot force-pushed the changeset-release/master branch 2 times, most recently from 371817a to 33ce98c Compare March 10, 2025 08:24
@ct-changesets ct-changesets bot force-pushed the changeset-release/master branch from 33ce98c to 6085def Compare March 10, 2025 09:08
@ajimae ajimae merged commit 9362a48 into master Mar 10, 2025
6 checks passed
@ajimae ajimae deleted the changeset-release/master branch March 10, 2025 09:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant