-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
remove FeatureExposure and SimpleMetric models #571
base: matt/remove-exposure-logging
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
✅ Sentry found no issues in your recent changes ✅ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Approved pending tests fixed
e493f09
to
84e8828
Compare
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## matt/remove-exposure-logging #571 +/- ##
=============================================================
Coverage 88.89% 88.89%
=============================================================
Files 462 463 +1
Lines 13199 13171 -28
Branches 1513 1511 -2
=============================================================
- Hits 11733 11709 -24
+ Misses 1145 1141 -4
Partials 321 321
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
actually this needs to be two PRs. we need to remove the exposure logging, ship in both worker and api, and then we can remove the table |
84e8828
to
024c5ba
Compare
CodSpeed Performance ReportMerging #571 will not alter performanceComparing Summary
|
024c5ba
to
04493d2
Compare
these were never really fleshed out so i am deleting them
if we want to re-add them in the future, we need to do it with partitioning
requires #573 to ship in worker and api before this can merge
also requires codecov/worker#1136 to have shipped in worker, but that's already merged
Legal Boilerplate
Look, I get it. The entity doing business as "Sentry" was incorporated in the State of Delaware in 2015 as Functional Software, Inc. In 2022 this entity acquired Codecov and as result Sentry is going to need some rights from me in order to utilize my contributions in this PR. So here's the deal: I retain all rights, title and interest in and to my contributions, and by keeping this boilerplate intact I confirm that Sentry can use, modify, copy, and redistribute my contributions, under Sentry's choice of terms.