Skip to content

V9.0.1/package maintenance #9

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 30, 2025
Merged

V9.0.1/package maintenance #9

merged 4 commits into from
Jan 30, 2025

Conversation

gimlichael
Copy link
Member

@gimlichael gimlichael commented Jan 30, 2025

This pull request includes several updates across various files to improve compatibility and update dependencies. The most important changes include updating the Docker image version, changing the target framework, and updating package versions.

Key changes:

Docker and Framework Updates:

  • Updated the Docker base image in .docfx/Dockerfile.docfx from nginx:1.27.0-alpine to nginx:1.27.3-alpine.
  • Updated the target framework in .docfx/docfx.json from net8.0 to net9.0.

Metadata and Licensing:

  • Updated the footer copyright year in .docfx/docfx.json and Directory.Build.props to include 2025. [1] [2]
  • Updated the LICENSE file to reflect the year 2025.

Package and Dependency Updates:

  • Updated various package versions in Directory.Packages.props to the latest versions.
  • Added a new version entry 9.0.1 in CHANGELOG.md and PackageReleaseNotes.txt with details on updated dependencies. [1] [2]

Documentation:

  • Added a link to the full documentation generated by DocFx in README.md.

These updates ensure that the project remains up-to-date with the latest dependencies and framework versions, improving overall compatibility and stability.

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes for Version 9.0.1

  • Package Updates

    • Updated package dependencies to latest versions
    • Added support for .NET 9
    • Removed some legacy package references
  • Documentation

    • Updated copyright year to 2024-2025
    • Added DocFx documentation link in README
    • Updated changelog with new version details
  • Infrastructure

    • Updated Nginx base image to 1.27.3-alpine
    • Updated test environment Docker image
  • Maintenance

    • Minor version increments across project dependencies

@gimlichael gimlichael self-assigned this Jan 30, 2025
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 30, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request encompasses a comprehensive update across multiple configuration files to support .NET 9 and update various project metadata. The changes include version bumps for dependencies, updating copyright years, modifying package references, and adjusting documentation. The modifications span across Dockerfile, DocFX configuration, package release notes, changelog, build properties, and test environment settings, reflecting a coordinated effort to transition the project to the latest .NET framework version.

Changes

File Change Summary
.docfx/Dockerfile.docfx Updated Nginx base image from 1.27.0-alpine to 1.27.3-alpine
.docfx/docfx.json Updated TargetFramework to net9.0 and copyright year to 2024-2025
.nuget/Codebelt.Extensions.Asp.Versioning/PackageReleaseNotes.txt Incremented version to 9.0.1 and updated .NET support
CHANGELOG.md Added new version entry 9.0.1 dated 2025-01-30
Directory.Build.props Updated copyright year to 2024-2025 and removed Microsoft.SourceLink.GitHub reference
Directory.Packages.props Updated multiple package versions from 9.0.0 to 9.0.1
LICENSE Updated copyright notice to 2024-2025
README.md Added DocFx documentation link
testenvironments.json Updated Docker image to net8.0.405-9.0.102

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 Hop, hop, version update time!
.NET 9 is climbing its prime
Packages dancing, configs align
From alpine to docs, all looking fine
A rabbit's code journey, simply sublime! 🚀


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.nuget/Codebelt.Extensions.Asp.Versioning/PackageReleaseNotes.txt (1)

4-5: Enhance release notes clarity

Consider these improvements:

  • Add "the" before "Dependencies"
  • Replace "with respect to TFMs" with "for TFMs" for conciseness
-# ALM
-- CHANGED Dependencies to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs
+# ALM
+- CHANGED the Dependencies to latest and greatest for TFMs
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~5-~5: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ... 8
 

ALM

  • CHANGED Dependencies to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs
     
    V...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)


[style] ~5-~5: ‘with respect to’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...GED Dependencies to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs
 
Version 9.0.0
Availability: ....

(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_WITH_RESPECT_TO)

CHANGELOG.md (1)

10-13: Consider adding specific dependency updates to the changelog entry.

While the entry follows the correct format and placement, it would be more helpful to list the specific package dependencies that were updated and their version changes. This helps users understand the scope of changes and assess potential impacts.

Example format:

 ## [9.0.1] - 2025-01-30
 
-This is a service update that primarily focuses on package dependencies and minor improvements.
+This is a service update that includes the following dependency updates:
+
+- Updated nginx from 1.27.0-alpine to 1.27.3-alpine
+- Updated {package} from {old_version} to {new_version}
+
+Other improvements:
+- Updated copyright year to 2025
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a17d2db and 0da585b.

📒 Files selected for processing (9)
  • .docfx/Dockerfile.docfx (1 hunks)
  • .docfx/docfx.json (2 hunks)
  • .nuget/Codebelt.Extensions.Asp.Versioning/PackageReleaseNotes.txt (1 hunks)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • Directory.Build.props (1 hunks)
  • Directory.Packages.props (1 hunks)
  • LICENSE (1 hunks)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
  • testenvironments.json (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
  • LICENSE
  • .docfx/Dockerfile.docfx
  • testenvironments.json
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
.nuget/Codebelt.Extensions.Asp.Versioning/PackageReleaseNotes.txt

[uncategorized] ~5-~5: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ... 8
 

ALM

  • CHANGED Dependencies to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs
     
    V...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)


[style] ~5-~5: ‘with respect to’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...GED Dependencies to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs
 
Version 9.0.0
Availability: ....

(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_WITH_RESPECT_TO)

🔇 Additional comments (5)
Directory.Packages.props (2)

10-16: LGTM! Consistent version updates across packages

All Codebelt and Cuemon packages have been consistently updated to version 9.0.1.


17-17: Verify Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk version compatibility

The version 17.12.0 seems to be ahead of the latest stable release. Please verify its compatibility with .NET 9.

✅ Verification successful

Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk version 17.12.0 is appropriate

The version 17.12.0 is the latest stable release available on NuGet, making it a suitable choice for the project.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check NuGet for Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk latest stable version
curl -s https://api.nuget.org/v3-flatcontainer/microsoft.net.test.sdk/index.json | jq -r '.versions[]' | sort -V | tail -n 5

Length of output: 200

Directory.Build.props (1)

19-19: LGTM! Copyright year updated correctly

The copyright year range follows the standard format "2024-2025".

.docfx/docfx.json (1)

15-15: LGTM! Consistent framework and copyright updates

The changes maintain consistency with other files:

  • TargetFramework updated to net9.0
  • Copyright year format matches other files

Also applies to: 48-48

README.md (1)

9-10: LGTM! Please verify the documentation link.

The addition of the documentation link is well-placed and properly formatted.

Let's verify that the documentation URL is accessible:

✅ Verification successful

Documentation link verified and accessible ✓

The documentation site is operational and properly secured with HTTPS. The link redirects to the API documentation page as expected.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify the documentation URL is accessible
curl -I https://versioning.codebelt.net/

Length of output: 543


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Follow the redirect and verify the documentation page
curl -IL https://versioning.codebelt.net/api/Codebelt.Extensions.Asp.Versioning.html

Length of output: 656

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 30, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.69%. Comparing base (31ef52d) to head (0da585b).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main       #9   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.69%   89.69%           
=======================================
  Files           4        4           
  Lines          97       97           
  Branches        9        9           
=======================================
  Hits           87       87           
  Misses         10       10           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@gimlichael gimlichael merged commit 3f74edf into main Jan 30, 2025
19 checks passed
@gimlichael gimlichael deleted the v9.0.1/package-maintenance branch January 30, 2025 21:15
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Apr 16, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant