Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 8, 2025. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@tamaro-skaljic
Copy link
Contributor

@tamaro-skaljic tamaro-skaljic commented Mar 27, 2025

I recommend reviewing commit by commit.

I'm not sure about 20b2e7b and 6aa5d9c, you can revert them if it's wrong.

Copy link
Contributor

@cloutiertyler cloutiertyler left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you! This is definitely an improvement. I've left some required suggestions before I can approve this.

Copy link
Contributor

@cloutiertyler cloutiertyler left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This now LGTM!

@tamaro-skaljic
Copy link
Contributor Author

When will this be merged?

@cloutiertyler cloutiertyler merged commit 17ee47d into clockworklabs:master Apr 16, 2025
@tamaro-skaljic tamaro-skaljic deleted the rename-module-to-database branch April 17, 2025 16:23
bfops pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2025
* clients connect to databases, not modules

* the name is for the database, not the module

* reducers are exposed by databases, not modules

* don't name clients "modules" too

* Modules have no state, the database has it

* more database instead of client connection

* databases are hosted, not modules

* users interact with databases, not modules

* fix typo

* Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: Tyler Cloutier <[email protected]>

* Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: Tyler Cloutier <[email protected]>

---------

Co-authored-by: Tyler Cloutier <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants