-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 392
chore(e2e): Test for changing the default payment method #6963
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: e4b92cb The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. This PR includes changesets to release 0 packagesWhen changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
WalkthroughAdds a new changeset metadata file and extends the pricing table integration test with a case that adds two payment methods and sets the second as default, verifying the default indicator and cleaning up the test user. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
autonumber
actor Tester
participant App as Web App (Pricing/Billing)
participant Billing as Billing UI
participant PM as Payment Methods List
Note over Tester,App: New test: Add two methods and set the second as default
Tester->>App: Sign in as test user
Tester->>Billing: Navigate to /billing
Tester->>PM: Add payment method (Visa)
Tester->>PM: Add payment method (Mastercard)
Tester->>PM: Open action menu (Mastercard)
Tester->>PM: Set as default
PM-->>Tester: UI shows Mastercard as default (Visa not default)
Tester->>App: Cleanup test user
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
integration/tests/pricing-table.test.ts (1)
705-706
: Consider a more robust selector for the menu button.Using
.last()
on the menu button selector assumes that DOM order matches the visual/logical order of payment methods. This could break if the DOM structure changes or if additional menu buttons are added elsewhere on the page.Consider a more specific approach:
- // Open menu for the last payment method and make it default - await u.po.page.locator('.cl-userProfile-root .cl-menuButtonEllipsis').last().click(); + // Open menu for the Mastercard payment method and make it default + await u.po.page + .getByText(/mastercard/i) + .locator('xpath=..') + .locator('.cl-menuButtonEllipsis') + .click();This ensures you're clicking the menu button specifically associated with the Mastercard entry.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Disabled knowledge base sources:
- Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories
You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.changeset/empty-bushes-tell.md
(1 hunks)integration/tests/pricing-table.test.ts
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (8)
**/*.{js,jsx,ts,tsx}
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.cursor/rules/development.mdc)
**/*.{js,jsx,ts,tsx}
: All code must pass ESLint checks with the project's configuration
Follow established naming conventions (PascalCase for components, camelCase for variables)
Maintain comprehensive JSDoc comments for public APIs
Use dynamic imports for optional features
All public APIs must be documented with JSDoc
Provide meaningful error messages to developers
Include error recovery suggestions where applicable
Log errors appropriately for debugging
Lazy load components and features when possible
Implement proper caching strategies
Use efficient data structures and algorithms
Profile and optimize critical paths
Validate all inputs and sanitize outputs
Implement proper logging with different levels
Files:
integration/tests/pricing-table.test.ts
**/*.{js,jsx,ts,tsx,json,css,scss,md,yaml,yml}
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.cursor/rules/development.mdc)
Use Prettier for consistent code formatting
Files:
integration/tests/pricing-table.test.ts
**/*.{ts,tsx}
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.cursor/rules/development.mdc)
Use proper TypeScript error types
**/*.{ts,tsx}
: Always define explicit return types for functions, especially public APIs
Use proper type annotations for variables and parameters where inference isn't clear
Avoidany
type - preferunknown
when type is uncertain, then narrow with type guards
Useinterface
for object shapes that might be extended
Usetype
for unions, primitives, and computed types
Preferreadonly
properties for immutable data structures
Useprivate
for internal implementation details
Useprotected
for inheritance hierarchies
Usepublic
explicitly for clarity in public APIs
Preferreadonly
for properties that shouldn't change after construction
Prefer composition and interfaces over deep inheritance chains
Use mixins for shared behavior across unrelated classes
Implement dependency injection for loose coupling
Let TypeScript infer when types are obvious
Useconst assertions
for literal types:as const
Usesatisfies
operator for type checking without widening
Use mapped types for transforming object types
Use conditional types for type-level logic
Leverage template literal types for string manipulation
Use ES6 imports/exports consistently
Use default exports sparingly, prefer named exports
Use type-only imports:import type { ... } from ...
Noany
types without justification
Proper error handling with typed errors
Consistent use ofreadonly
for immutable data
Proper generic constraints
No unused type parameters
Proper use of utility types instead of manual type construction
Type-only imports where possible
Proper tree-shaking friendly exports
No circular dependencies
Efficient type computations (avoid deep recursion)
Files:
integration/tests/pricing-table.test.ts
integration/**
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.cursor/rules/global.mdc)
Framework integration templates and E2E tests should be placed under the integration/ directory
Files:
integration/tests/pricing-table.test.ts
integration/**/*
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.cursor/rules/monorepo.mdc)
End-to-end tests and integration templates must be located in the 'integration/' directory.
Files:
integration/tests/pricing-table.test.ts
integration/**/*.{test,spec}.{js,ts}
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.cursor/rules/monorepo.mdc)
Integration tests should use Playwright.
Files:
integration/tests/pricing-table.test.ts
**/*.{js,ts,tsx,jsx}
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.cursor/rules/monorepo.mdc)
Support multiple Clerk environment variables (CLERK_, NEXT_PUBLIC_CLERK_, etc.) for configuration.
Files:
integration/tests/pricing-table.test.ts
.changeset/**
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.cursor/rules/monorepo.mdc)
Automated releases must use Changesets.
Files:
.changeset/empty-bushes-tell.md
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
integration/tests/pricing-table.test.ts (1)
integration/testUtils/index.ts (1)
createTestUtils
(24-86)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (29)
- GitHub Check: Integration Tests (billing, chrome)
- GitHub Check: Integration Tests (nextjs, chrome, 14)
- GitHub Check: Integration Tests (nextjs, chrome, 15)
- GitHub Check: Integration Tests (react-router, chrome)
- GitHub Check: Integration Tests (machine, chrome)
- GitHub Check: Integration Tests (elements, chrome)
- GitHub Check: Integration Tests (custom, chrome)
- GitHub Check: Integration Tests (handshake:staging, chrome)
- GitHub Check: Integration Tests (vue, chrome)
- GitHub Check: Integration Tests (tanstack-react-start, chrome)
- GitHub Check: Integration Tests (nuxt, chrome)
- GitHub Check: Integration Tests (expo-web, chrome)
- GitHub Check: Integration Tests (sessions:staging, chrome)
- GitHub Check: Integration Tests (astro, chrome)
- GitHub Check: Integration Tests (handshake, chrome)
- GitHub Check: Integration Tests (ap-flows, chrome)
- GitHub Check: Integration Tests (sessions, chrome)
- GitHub Check: Integration Tests (localhost, chrome)
- GitHub Check: Integration Tests (quickstart, chrome)
- GitHub Check: Integration Tests (express, chrome)
- GitHub Check: Integration Tests (generic, chrome)
- GitHub Check: Unit Tests (18, --filter=@clerk/astro --filter=@clerk/backend --filter=@clerk/express --filter=@c...
- GitHub Check: Publish with pkg-pr-new
- GitHub Check: Unit Tests (22, **)
- GitHub Check: Static analysis
- GitHub Check: Formatting | Dedupe | Changeset
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
- GitHub Check: semgrep-cloud-platform/scan
- GitHub Check: semgrep-cloud-platform/scan
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.changeset/empty-bushes-tell.md (1)
1-2
: Verify if this empty changeset is intentional.This changeset file contains only the YAML frontmatter delimiters with no content. Typically, a changeset should include package names with bump types and a description of changes. An empty changeset might be intentional if no packages require version bumps, but this is unusual.
If content is missing, a typical changeset should look like:
--- "@clerk/package-name": patch --- Brief description of the changesIf this is intentional (e.g., for test-only changes), consider adding a comment to clarify.
integration/tests/pricing-table.test.ts (2)
659-723
: LGTM! Test structure follows established patterns.The test correctly:
- Creates and cleans up a fake user
- Follows the standard sign-in and navigation flow
- Verifies both the addition and default status of payment methods
- Uses appropriate assertions
709-714
: Note the extended timeout for default status verification.The 15-second timeout on line 714 suggests that the default status update might be slow or potentially flaky. While this makes the test more resilient, it's worth investigating whether the UI update can be optimized or if there's a more reliable way to wait for the state change.
Consider monitoring this test for flakiness, as the extended timeout might indicate underlying timing issues.
@clerk/agent-toolkit
@clerk/astro
@clerk/backend
@clerk/chrome-extension
@clerk/clerk-js
@clerk/dev-cli
@clerk/elements
@clerk/clerk-expo
@clerk/expo-passkeys
@clerk/express
@clerk/fastify
@clerk/localizations
@clerk/nextjs
@clerk/nuxt
@clerk/clerk-react
@clerk/react-router
@clerk/remix
@clerk/shared
@clerk/tanstack-react-start
@clerk/testing
@clerk/themes
@clerk/types
@clerk/upgrade
@clerk/vue
commit: |
Description
Checklist
pnpm test
runs as expected.pnpm build
runs as expected.Type of change
Summary by CodeRabbit