Skip to content

Conversation

@vvb610
Copy link
Contributor

@vvb610 vvb610 commented Oct 21, 2025

I believe the test statistic needs to be changed for asymptotics and seems most natural to send the number of markets to infinity?

Copy link
Owner

@chrisconlon chrisconlon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No we ned the constant to be "N" = \sum_t dim(\mathcal{J}_t) since we're summing over all products and markets.

@vvb610
Copy link
Contributor Author

vvb610 commented Oct 22, 2025

I thought more about this and I believe one can get away with sending the number of markets $T \to \infty$ (for the sake of asymptotics) in the following way if one wishes to have a different number of goods in each market (the previous edits only work if each market has the same number of goods). [EDIT: I think that what I wrote in the commit would actually also work for doing the asymptotics with a variable number of goods in each market.]

Define the population moment

$$h(\omega_{t}^m, z_{t}) = \mathbb{E}_t \left[\frac{1}{\mathcal{J}_t}\sum_{j=1}^{\mathcal{J}_t} \omega_{jt}^m \cdot \hat{g}(z_{jt})\right]$$

The empirical sample moment is

$$\hat{h}(\hat{\omega}^m, z) = \frac{1}{T}\sum_{t=1}^T\left(\frac{1}{\mathcal{J}_t}\sum_{j=1}^{\mathcal{J}_t} \hat\omega_{jt}^m \cdot \hat{g}(z_{jt})\right)$$

The GMM objective is

$$Q(\eta^m) = (\hat{h}(\omega^m, z))^2$$

The DGP is that one observed a market $t$ with all $\mathcal{J}_t$ goods (with $J_t$ bounded) from a process that simultaneously samples the entire market $iid$ from some distribution, which makes it clear that the expectation is over $t$ in the population moment.

It's a bit odd for me to think about the data-generating process being over [product $\times$ markets], but I'd be curious if there's a DGP that supports that and what the expectation is over. The reason that I think that taking $JT \to \infty$ is potentially odd is that for a given market, each of the products have dependent data (eg., the shares must sum to $1$, etc.) so that I don't think one can think that each product $\times$ market is an $iid$ sample from some distribution. [EDIT: I suppose one can index the observed product $\times$ markets by $i \in {1, ..., N}$ where $N := \sum_t^T J_t$ and define $X_i := (p_i, \xi_i, x_i, s_i, z_i)$ and assume that the data-generating process simultaneously produces $X_1, ..., X_N$. Some of the data-points $X_i$ are dependent (since they come from the same market), but then we apply some "finite-block-dependent" asymptotic theory -- this seems a bit less satisfying.]

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants