Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Aggregated empty proofs for blEVM #144

Open
3 tasks
ninabarbakadze opened this issue Feb 7, 2025 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #149
Open
3 tasks

Aggregated empty proofs for blEVM #144

ninabarbakadze opened this issue Feb 7, 2025 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #149
Assignees
Labels
demo Needed to complete demo

Comments

@ninabarbakadze
Copy link
Member

ninabarbakadze commented Feb 7, 2025

Acceptance Criteria

  • Measure the cycles and time to generate a real aggregate EVM STF proof.
  • Measure the cycles and time to generate an empty aggregate EVM STF proof.
  • Put that data in a README
@ninabarbakadze ninabarbakadze self-assigned this Feb 7, 2025
@rootulp rootulp added the demo Needed to complete demo label Feb 14, 2025
@rootulp rootulp linked a pull request Feb 24, 2025 that will close this issue
@rootulp rootulp mentioned this issue Mar 4, 2025
@rootulp
Copy link
Collaborator

rootulp commented Mar 5, 2025

Can acceptance criteria of this issue please include:

  • Measure the cycles and time to generate a real aggregate EVM STF proof.
  • Measure the cycles and time to generate an empty aggregate EVM STF proof.
  • Put that data in a README

@ninabarbakadze
Copy link
Member Author

Yes! These things are missing for the non hollowed out aggregator too. @tuxcanfly if extending blevm readme to provide instructions on how to generate aggregate proofs, etc. I'll write a description, AC and address the rest of the requests you made in the PR comments.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
demo Needed to complete demo
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants