Change allow(missing_docs) to expect(..)
#10384
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
alexcrichton
requested review from
cfallin and
dicej
and removed request for
a team
dicej
approved these changes
Mar 12, 2025
github-actions
bot
added
cranelift
Subscribe to Label Actioncc @fitzgen
This issue or pull request has been labeled: "cranelift", "cranelift:module", "pulley"
Thus the following users have been cc'd because of the following labels:
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this label, edit the |
This wasn't possible when `expect` was first introduced due to a change being required in upstream rust-lang/rust. That change rust-lang/rust#130025) has now rode enough trains to be in our MSRV, so we can expect missing docs now instead of just allowing it.
alexcrichton
force-pushed
the
expect-missing-docs
branch
from
49e8b59 to
0fcb767
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This wasn't possible when
expectwas first introduced due to a change being required in upstream rust-lang/rust. That change rust-lang/rust#130025) has now rode enough trains to be in our MSRV, so we can expect missing docs now instead of just allowing it.