Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GHA: Avoid using gcc-toolchain change for Clang jobs and stop using Ubuntu 20 runners #194

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Feb 28, 2025

Conversation

Flamefire
Copy link
Collaborator

Use containers where required to avoid picking up an incompatible libstdc++

@Flamefire Flamefire force-pushed the ci branch 2 times, most recently from 3b80a0b to a397c5b Compare February 12, 2025 11:17
@Flamefire Flamefire changed the title GHA: Avoid using gcc-toolchain change for Clang jobs GHA: Avoid using gcc-toolchain change for Clang jobs and stop using Ubuntu 20 runners Feb 13, 2025
@Flamefire Flamefire force-pushed the ci branch 3 times, most recently from d494896 to e01aac3 Compare February 14, 2025 16:21
@boostorg boostorg deleted a comment from codecov bot Feb 14, 2025
@boostorg boostorg deleted a comment from codecov bot Feb 15, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 27, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.39%. Comparing base (64f1eee) to head (8f1078a).
Report is 6 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop     #194   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    99.39%   99.39%           
========================================
  Files           34       34           
  Lines         3460     3460           
========================================
  Hits          3439     3439           
  Misses          21       21           

@Flamefire Flamefire merged commit b7987c4 into develop Feb 28, 2025
84 checks passed
@Flamefire Flamefire deleted the ci branch February 28, 2025 08:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant