-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs(README): Clarify how to install and use the Capture #38
Conversation
- New installation methods - Badges - OpenAPI Reference - License
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant changes to the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
README.md (5)
1-9
: Consider regrouping badges for better organization.Consider reorganizing the badges into logical groups:
- Status badges (license, repo size, language)
- Activity badges (commit activity, last commit, issues, PRs)
- Reference badges (go reference, actions)
This would make it easier for users to find relevant information at a glance.
19-65
: Consider adding Docker security best practices.While the Docker installation instructions are comprehensive, consider adding security best practices:
- Add
--security-opt no-new-privileges
flag to prevent privilege escalation- Consider using
--read-only
flag since the container doesn't need write access- Add resource limits using
--memory
and--cpus
flagsExample secure Docker run command:
docker run -v /etc/os-release:/etc/os-release:ro \ -p 59232:59232 \ -e API_SECRET=REPLACE_WITH_YOUR_SECRET \ -d \ + --security-opt no-new-privileges \ + --read-only \ + --memory=512m \ + --cpus=0.5 \ ghcr.io/bluewave-labs/capture:latest
119-119
: Simplify the emphasis on secret configuration.Replace the exclamation mark with a more professional emphasis.
-! **You need to put this secret to Checkmate's infrastructure monitoring dashboard** +**Important:** You need to put this secret to Checkmate's infrastructure monitoring dashboard🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~119-~119: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 10 exclamation marks for a text that’s 2759 characters long)
Context: ...your_secret
with your own secret ! **You need to put this secret to Checkm...(EN_EXCESSIVE_EXCLAMATION)
Line range hint
67-134
: Consider adding validation steps after installation.The installation instructions are clear, but consider adding a section on how to verify the successful installation and configuration:
- How to check if the service is running
- How to verify the API is accessible
- Basic troubleshooting steps
Would you like me to help draft a validation section?
139-141
: Consider enhancing API documentation section.The OpenAPI reference could be improved:
- Link to the main branch instead of develop to ensure stability
- Add information about API versioning if applicable
- Consider adding a quick reference for common API endpoints
-You can find the OpenAPI specifications [here](https://github.com/bluewave-labs/capture/blob/develop/openapi.yml) +You can find the OpenAPI specifications [here](https://github.com/bluewave-labs/capture/blob/main/openapi.yml) + +### Quick Reference +- GET /metrics - Retrieve all metrics +- GET /health - Check service health
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
README.md
(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md
[style] ~119-~119: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 10 exclamation marks for a text that’s 2759 characters long)
Context: ...your_secret
with your own secret ! **You need to put this secret to Checkm...
(EN_EXCESSIVE_EXCLAMATION)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
README.md (1)
11-17
: LGTM! Clear and well-structured introduction.
The header and introduction effectively communicate the tool's purpose and limitations.
…vironment Variables list
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
README.md (4)
1-9
: Consider streamlining the badge selection.While badges provide useful metadata, consider keeping only the most relevant ones to maintain focus. Essential badges would be:
- License
- Go Reference
- GitHub Actions (CI status)
- Last commit/activity
The others (repo size, language, issues count) might be less crucial for users.
59-64
: Remove redundant Docker run command.This Docker run command is identical to the one shown earlier. Consider removing this duplicate to maintain DRY principles in documentation.
137-137
: Improve emphasis style in warning messages.Instead of using exclamation marks, consider using a more professional warning style:
-! **You need to put this secret to Checkmate's infrastructure monitoring dashboard** +> ⚠️ **Important**: Configure this secret in Checkmate's infrastructure monitoring dashboardAlso applies to: 51-51
139-151
: Enhance environment variable examples.Consider these improvements for the environment variable examples:
- Use more realistic example values
- Add comments explaining the impact of each setting
- Show both development and production configurations
# Example configuration -PORT = your_port -API_SECRET = your_secret -GIN_MODE = release/debug +# Development configuration +PORT=8080 # Default API port +API_SECRET=dev-secret-123 # Development secret (change in production) +GIN_MODE=debug # Enables detailed logging + +# Production configuration +PORT=59232 # Default production port +API_SECRET=<secret> # Use a strong, unique secret +GIN_MODE=release # Optimized for production
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
README.md
(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md
[style] ~136-~136: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 10 exclamation marks for a text that’s 3292 characters long)
Context: ...lt your_secret
with your own secret. ! **You need to put this secret to Checkm...
(EN_EXCESSIVE_EXCLAMATION)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
README.md (3)
11-18
: LGTM! Clear and well-structured introduction.
The introduction effectively communicates the tool's purpose and limitations.
77-79
: Verify the go install command functionality.
Let's verify if the go install command is properly configured in the module.
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify the module path and package structure further to ensure the installation command is correct.
The go install command is correctly configured
The verification confirms that:
- The module path matches:
github.com/bluewave-labs/capture
- There's a valid
main
package incmd/capture/main.go
- The package structure follows Go conventions
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the module has a main package at the specified path
ast-grep --pattern 'package main' cmd/capture/
Length of output: 83
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the module name in go.mod
cat go.mod | grep "module"
# Check the structure of cmd/capture directory
ls -la cmd/capture/
# Verify main.go content
head -n 10 cmd/capture/main.go
Length of output: 380
155-157
: Verify OpenAPI specification availability.
Let's verify the existence and validity of the OpenAPI specification.
✅ Verification successful
OpenAPI specification is valid and correctly referenced
The OpenAPI specification file exists at the referenced location, contains valid OpenAPI 3.0.0 specification content, and has substantial content (6.8KB in size). The documentation in README.md accurately reflects its location and purpose.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if openapi.yml exists and is valid YAML
if [ -f openapi.yml ]; then
yamllint openapi.yml
fi
Length of output: 146
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if openapi.yml exists in the repository
fd -t f "openapi.yml"
# Also check for any yaml/yml files that might contain OpenAPI specs
fd -t f -e yml -e yaml | grep -i "api"
Length of output: 84
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of openapi.yml to verify it's an OpenAPI specification
head -n 10 openapi.yml
# Also get the file size to ensure it's not empty
ls -l openapi.yml
Length of output: 373
Preview on GitHub
Summary by CodeRabbit
README.md
to enhance clarity and usability.