test #3
test #3
Conversation
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| }); | ||
| // Calculate position from diff_hunk | ||
| const position = comment.diff_hunk |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Intellizzer:
The calculation of position should handle cases where comment.diff_hunk might not contain any lines starting with + or -. This could lead to unexpected results if the findIndex method returns -1, which would cause an incorrect position to be used.
| line: comment.line, | ||
| commit_id: comment.commit_id, | ||
| side: "RIGHT", | ||
| diff_hunk: comment.diff_hunk, | ||
| in_reply_to: undefined, // Add optional in_reply_to parameter |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Intellizzer:
The in_reply_to parameter is set to undefined. If this is intended to be optional, ensure that the API can handle undefined values appropriately, or consider removing it if not needed.
| }); | ||
| // Calculate position from diff_hunk | ||
| const position = comment.diff_hunk |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Intellizzer:
The variable position is calculated based on the assumption that the first line starting with + or - is the correct position. This may not always be accurate. Consider revising the logic to ensure it correctly identifies the intended position in all cases.
| line: comment.line, | ||
| commit_id: comment.commit_id, | ||
| side: "RIGHT", | ||
| diff_hunk: comment.diff_hunk, | ||
| in_reply_to: undefined, // Add optional in_reply_to parameter |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Intellizzer:
The in_reply_to parameter is set to undefined. If this is intended to be optional, it might be better to omit it entirely rather than explicitly setting it to undefined.
| comment.diff_hunk | ||
| .split("\n") | ||
| .findIndex( | ||
| (line) => line.startsWith("+") || line.startsWith("-") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Intellizzer:
The use of findIndex here could lead to unexpected results if the diff_hunk does not contain any lines starting with + or -. Consider adding a check to handle such cases.
| await this.octokit.pulls.createReviewComment({ | ||
| owner, | ||
| repo, | ||
| pull_number, | ||
| body: comment.body, | ||
| path: comment.path, | ||
| line: comment.line, | ||
| position, | ||
| line: comment.line, // Add required line parameter |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Intellizzer:
The comment // Add required line parameter is unnecessary and should be removed to maintain code clarity.
| await this.octokit.pulls.createReviewComment({ | ||
| owner, | ||
| repo, | ||
| pull_number, | ||
| body: comment.body, | ||
| path: comment.path, | ||
| line: comment.line, | ||
| position, | ||
| line: comment.line, // Add required line parameter | ||
| commit_id: comment.commit_id, | ||
| side: "RIGHT", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Intellizzer:
The comment // Add optional in_reply_to parameter is unnecessary and should be removed to maintain code clarity.
No description provided.