Skip to content

docs(tax): TAX-1750 add store operations docs for tax customers and tax property type field #929

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 6, 2025

Conversation

declankirk
Copy link
Contributor

@declankirk declankirk commented May 2, 2025

TAX-1750

What changed?

  • Adding documentation for the new /v3/tax/customers endpoint, for configuring customer tax data (currently just tax_properties)
  • Adding new tax properties type field to dictate whether property is associated to PRODUCT or CUSTOMER

Release notes draft

  • Added a new optional type field to tax properties, allowing you to specify whether a property is associated with a product or a customer. If not set, it will default to PRODUCT.
  • Added new /v3/tax/customers endpoint for managing customer tax data. Supports the following operations:
    • GET: Retrieve tax data for one or more customers.
    • PUT: Add or update tax properties for customers.
    • DELETE: Remove tax data for specified customers.

Anything else?

ping @bigcommerce/team-tax

@declankirk declankirk force-pushed the TAX-1750-mdx branch 2 times, most recently from 5211351 to 5652d1e Compare May 2, 2025 01:40
@declankirk declankirk marked this pull request as ready for review May 2, 2025 03:09
@declankirk declankirk requested a review from a team May 2, 2025 03:23
@declankirk declankirk force-pushed the TAX-1750-mdx branch 2 times, most recently from 8eea51f to 734652e Compare May 5, 2025 23:12
bc-terra
bc-terra previously approved these changes May 6, 2025
@declankirk declankirk merged commit 0473238 into main May 6, 2025
3 checks passed
@declankirk declankirk deleted the TAX-1750-mdx branch May 6, 2025 23:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants