-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 931
added part count and content range validation for download request #6353
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
String actualContentRange = response.contentRange(); | ||
if (actualContentRange != null && partSize == null) { | ||
getRangeInfo(actualContentRange); | ||
log.debug(() -> String.format("Part size of the object to download: " + partSize)); | ||
log.debug(() -> String.format("Total Content Length of the object to download: " + totalContentLength)); | ||
} | ||
|
||
validateContentRange(totalComplete, actualContentRange); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It looks like there a race on the partSize and totalContentLength, since reading them is done outside of the lock. Or do we know that they won't change per part so it's safe?
Can you explain why it's safe to have multiple get object results modifying the part size and total content length in parallel before we do (again, potentially parallel) validation on them?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The MultipartDownloaderSubscriber sends request and receives request one at a time in sequence, so it won't receive responses in parallel ideally. Also totalContentLength should be the same for all the responses. However, I realized that the partSize is not the same for different part and the validation for contentRange is removed from the requirement, so I'll update the PR for that
@@ -117,6 +128,7 @@ public void onNext(AsyncResponseTransformer<GetObjectResponse, GetObjectResponse | |||
|
|||
synchronized (lock) { | |||
if (totalParts != null && nextPartToGet > totalParts) { | |||
validatePartsCount(completedParts.get()); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we create a variable for completedParts.get() before line 127 so that we don't have to call .get again here?
Can we also move this line after line 122
...ava/software/amazon/awssdk/services/s3/internal/multipart/MultipartDownloaderSubscriber.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...ava/software/amazon/awssdk/services/s3/internal/multipart/MultipartDownloaderSubscriber.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...ava/software/amazon/awssdk/services/s3/internal/multipart/MultipartDownloaderSubscriber.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
Motivation and Context
For the part get request for S3 transfer manager, When a response is received, the S3 Transfer Manager MUST check the value of ContentRange and validate that it matches with the expected range for the specific part number. After all requests have been sent, we should validate that the total number of part GET requests sent matches with the expected PartsCount. This PR implements the validation.
Modifications
Added validation method in MultipartDownloaderSubscriber class
Testing
Added wiremock test for failed test
Screenshots (if appropriate)
Types of changes
Checklist
mvn install
succeedsscripts/new-change
script and following the instructions. Commit the new file created by the script in.changes/next-release
with your changes.License