Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

adding support for map[string]bool types #579

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 7, 2025

Conversation

rushmash91
Copy link
Member

Description of changes:
Needs rebase to the removed shamelist

adding support map[string]bool types

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

@ack-prow ack-prow bot requested review from a-hilaly and jlbutler April 4, 2025 19:08
@rushmash91 rushmash91 changed the title adding support map[string]bool types adding support for map[string]bool types Apr 4, 2025
@rushmash91
Copy link
Member Author

EC2 is flacky..

Copy link
Member

@a-hilaly a-hilaly left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks @rushmash91 !
/lgtm

return out
}

func getAWSMapType(valueType string) string {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm thinking if we can use a more descriptive name here resolveAWSMapValueType or nativeTypeToAWSType, maybe a comment to the function can help as well

@ack-prow ack-prow bot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved labels Apr 4, 2025
@ack-prow ack-prow bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 7, 2025
@rushmash91
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

7 similar comments
@rushmash91
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@rushmash91
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@rushmash91
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@rushmash91
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@rushmash91
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@rushmash91
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@rushmash91
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@a-hilaly
Copy link
Member

a-hilaly commented Apr 7, 2025

/lgtm cancel

@a-hilaly
Copy link
Member

a-hilaly commented Apr 7, 2025

/lgtm

@ack-prow ack-prow bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 7, 2025
@a-hilaly
Copy link
Member

a-hilaly commented Apr 7, 2025

/lgtm cancel

@ack-prow ack-prow bot removed lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved labels Apr 7, 2025
@a-hilaly
Copy link
Member

a-hilaly commented Apr 7, 2025

will this just merge if we lgtm? @rushmash91 @michaelhtm - i'm asking because the commits are diverging

@michaelhtm
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@ack-prow ack-prow bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 7, 2025
Copy link

ack-prow bot commented Apr 7, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

Approval requirements bypassed by manually added approval.

This pull-request has been approved by: michaelhtm, rushmash91

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@rushmash91
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

1 similar comment
@rushmash91
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@rushmash91
Copy link
Member Author

/restest

@rushmash91
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

Copy link

ack-prow bot commented Apr 7, 2025

@rushmash91: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
verify-attribution 66ad2d0 link false /test verify-attribution
s3-olm-test 66ad2d0 link false /test s3-olm-test

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@ack-prow ack-prow bot merged commit a782a62 into aws-controllers-k8s:main Apr 7, 2025
17 of 19 checks passed
rushmash91 added a commit to rushmash91/code-generator that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2025
Description of changes:
**Needs rebase to the removed shamelist**

adding support `map[string]bool` types

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
rushmash91 added a commit to rushmash91/code-generator that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2025
Description of changes:
**Needs rebase to the removed shamelist**

adding support `map[string]bool` types

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
rushmash91 added a commit to rushmash91/code-generator that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2025
Description of changes:
**Needs rebase to the removed shamelist**

adding support `map[string]bool` types

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants