Add link to Resources wiki page

[bf4]

What do you think about promoting some wiki-based user-content?

[joonty]

👍

[bf4]

@joonty Thanks for the +1. I'm adding here more details of my thoughts about this PR.

1. ppwm-the-website is curated by maintainers who may have opinions. Getting info on the site requires both a successful PR and a release
2. A wiki allows the user-community to actively maintain and curate its own resources in real-time, but raises the risk of either duplicating content, having two sources of content (violates DRY), or keeping out good content from getting into the site.

I think the benefits of the wiki outweigh the cons, but created the issue so this can be discussed.

[rwjblue]

We can remove the deployment issues by using Travis's auto-deployment upon successful build. That way all that we would need to do is merge a PR, and the site would be updated.

In general, I think that perhaps a curated list is still the better way to go. I'm not 100% sure how others feel about this (I may be nuts), but it seems to me that this site is used as a reference to new-comers, and as such we should attempt not to lead them down rabbit-holes. If we allow user created content, the suggestions have not been vetted and confirmed as good practice, and it could cause a less than ideal starting point for new pairers...

I do think that there is a place for a wiki in general, but I don't think it can replace what we have here...

[joonty]

My understanding was that the wiki wouldn't be replacing the existing content, but would be an addition for those who want to search a bit further. That means that we can watch as users agree on the best practices, and update the main site accordingly.

A bit like a bleeding edge (the wiki) and a stable version (the site).

Or have I misunderstood?

[rwjblue]

@joonty - That makes total sense, and I think a Wiki definitely has a place here (as you described). I just want to make sure we are all on the same page...

[bf4]

@joonty @rjackson my thoughts exactly. I think there's a place for bleeding edge, but am not sure how we can ensure it doesn't interfere with or confuse the site's recommendations/resources.

e.g. we don't recommend screen, but why not allow someone on the wiki to offer resources for pairing with screen?

or e.g. a place to share user-contributed pairing scripts like https://gist.github.com/marksim/5785406 / http://blog.quarternotecoda.com/blog/2013/06/06/quick-script-for-tmux-pair-sessions/

[bf4]

@avdi @joonty @rjackson ok to merge? I cleaned out the wiki page to make it only additional info.

[rwjblue]

Seems good to me.

[chrisradford]

Are there other resources that should be on the wiki that are currently under 'resources'? It's a pretty bit list down there.

Alternatively should there be a 'recommended setup' for new users as a jumping off point; not that I fancy having the discussion as to which tool is best.

Also the wording of the sidebars seems inconsistent:

Is this page missing something?
Pull requests are welcome!
As well as updating the wiki

Shouldn't it be:

Is this page missing something?
Pull requests are welcome!
As well as updates to the wiki

Edit: I knew I'd seen 'recommended setup' somewhere before: Golden Path #2

[avdi]

I'm definitely down for having some more open user-curated content in the form of a wiki. 👍

[bf4]

@avdi good enough for merging and then perhaps some pruning of site content to the wiki?