Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Inquiry about SICK laser intensity #125

Open
Shanci-Li opened this issue Aug 15, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Inquiry about SICK laser intensity #125

Shanci-Li opened this issue Aug 15, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@Shanci-Li
Copy link

Hi Yiyi! Thanks for your great work and effort in maintaining the repo. I am currently trying to generate the accumulated point clouds with intensity from raw 3D data. For Velodyne, I know the intensity is saved in the 4th column in the binary file. But it seems there are only 2 columns for SICK scans. Does that mean there is no intensity provided with SICK scans?

Best regards,
Shanci

@yiyiliao
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi Shanci, thank you for your interest! Yes, our provided data do not include the intensity of SICK scans.

@Shanci-Li
Copy link
Author

Shanci-Li commented Aug 19, 2024

Hi Yiyi! Thanks for your help! Besides the SICK intensity, I have a question regarding an explanation about Velodyne intensity you had in another issue #73 : 'Also, values above 100 indicate retro-reflective targets.'. I checked the distribution of the intensity in the accumulated point cloud I had recovered, the normalized intensity mostly ranges from 0-0.4 (which is 0-100 for an 8-bit scale). To generalize the dataset with the high-accuracy lidar scans (intensity in 16 bits), do you think it is a good idea to cut off the intensity above 0.4 and normalize the intensity again? (I observed that the intensity from high-accuracy LiDAR generally follows a shifted Gaussian Distribution between 0-65535). I am not sure whether retro-reflective targets are important in semantic segmentation applications. I would apprentice it if you can give some suggestions on the data processing.

Best regards,
Shanci

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants