Skip to content

Conversation

@r0qs
Copy link
Member

@r0qs r0qs commented Oct 21, 2025

As suggested here: #16253 (comment). This PR replaces our current code-style setup by a github action. After merging we can completely remove the need of a bot account.

@r0qs r0qs requested review from cameel and nikola-matic October 21, 2025 10:25
@r0qs r0qs force-pushed the move-coding-style-check-to-gh-actions branch 2 times, most recently from 5497399 to 8059962 Compare October 27, 2025 15:26
@r0qs
Copy link
Member Author

r0qs commented Oct 27, 2025

Note that ci/circleci: chk_coding_style will need to be replaced by github chk_coding_style in the branch protection setting as a required check.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale The issue/PR was marked as stale because it has been open for too long. label Nov 11, 2025
@nikola-matic nikola-matic force-pushed the move-coding-style-check-to-gh-actions branch from 8059962 to a28d095 Compare November 12, 2025 07:35
@nikola-matic nikola-matic removed the stale The issue/PR was marked as stale because it has been open for too long. label Nov 12, 2025
@argotorg argotorg deleted a comment from github-actions bot Nov 15, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants