-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 283
ATLEDGE-553: Modify library examples header info #173
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7969282
ATLEDGE-553: Modify library examples header info
b5a10ce
Moved Copyright terms down to bottom of same file instead of in a sep…
db5e3be
ATLEDGE-553: Modify library examples header info. Update Copyright 2016
7a2670a
ATLEDGE-553: Modify library examples header info. Update Copyright 2016
2c7f034
ATLEDGE-586: String.compareTo() does not compute the same as Uno for …
850b8b3
Backed out fix for strcmp() bug as sugguested by team. To be investig…
5053859
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/bokibi/corelibs-arduino101
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sneaking in a functional change ;)
I'm happy with this, usually not a fan of re-implementing std routines but in this case it does appear that
"strcmp" is indeed not behaving as advertised. I'll fix the conflict and merge it.
This seems odd to me since we are not using any home-made versions of strcmp, it just comes from the std. C++ lib (which, admittedly, comes with our toolchain). If there is an error in the libs shipped with our toolchain, I'd like to find it-- when was the first time you noticed this issue?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wuh.. this is not okay. I see a few more code changes in the PR. Perhaps the PR needs to be rebased to the tip?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh yeah you're right, there are more functional changes that I missed. OK, so @bokibi can you please remove functional changes from this PR? leave header changes only, like the title suggests.
That said, I believe your "strcmp" re-implementation is a valid fix, and I would like to merge it also if we cannot fix the toolchain. Please make a new pull request for each functional change. And, like @calvinatintel says you'll probably need to rebase.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agree with Calvin. It may require more work. However, for future referencing and categorizing, it is desirable to separate out issues into individual reports. It will also ensure the discussion, analysis of the issues will not be mixed together.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agree. I will back out the change for strcmp issue. Erik, the issue was
found by Janet Y Scholar and assigned to me.