Skip to content

Conversation

@mialeska
Copy link
Contributor

PR Details

Related Issue Link:
How Has This Been Tested
Checklist
  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.

@mialeska mialeska self-assigned this Dec 30, 2025
@mialeska mialeska added enhancement New feature or request java dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file labels Dec 30, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to In progress in Aquality Core Dec 30, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 30, 2025

Walkthrough

Updated pom.xml to bump the test-scoped dependency org.apache.commons:commons-lang3 from 3.18.0 to 3.20.0.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Dependency Version Update
pom.xml
Updated org.apache.commons:commons-lang3 version from 3.18.03.20.0 (scope: test)

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 I hopped through pom lines bright and spry,
Pushed Commons Lang up a version high.
Tests will dance with newer code,
A small change down the dependency road.
Tiny bump — a cheerful sigh ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ❓ Inconclusive The PR description follows the template structure but lacks critical information: no Related Issue Link is provided, the 'How Has This Been Tested' section is completely empty, and only 2 of 5 checklist items are completed without explanation. Add the Related Issue Link, provide details on how the dependency update was tested, and complete the remaining checklist items or explain why they don't apply.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'Enhancement/update appache commons lang3' contains a typo ('appache' instead of 'apache') and accurately reflects the main change of updating the commons-lang3 dependency from 3.18.0 to 3.20.0.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch enhancement/update-appache-commons-lang3

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b4af346 and 5871044.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pom.xml
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • pom.xml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
  • GitHub Check: aquality-automation.aquality-selenium-core-java (Run tests)
  • GitHub Check: aquality-automation.aquality-selenium-core-java (Analyse code with SonarQube)

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@mialeska mialeska force-pushed the enhancement/update-appache-commons-lang3 branch from b4af346 to 5871044 Compare December 30, 2025 19:55
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@mialeska mialeska merged commit debf77c into master Dec 31, 2025
6 checks passed
@mialeska mialeska deleted the enhancement/update-appache-commons-lang3 branch December 31, 2025 10:47
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In progress to Done in Aquality Core Dec 31, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file enhancement New feature or request java

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants