Version Packages - #17
Merged
Merged
Conversation
github-actions
Bot
force-pushed
the
changeset-release/main
branch
from
August 7, 2026 17:51
13f4045 to
f8bab99
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR was opened by the Changesets release GitHub action. When you're ready to do a release, you can merge this and the packages will be published to npm automatically. If you're not ready to do a release yet, that's fine, whenever you add more changesets to main, this PR will be updated.
Releases
@appx-org/agent-client@0.2.1
Patch Changes
@appx-org/agent-protocol@0.2.1
@appx-org/agent-server@0.2.1
Patch Changes
17bb2ab: Make the deploy-app skill state the app port publish rule in one unambiguous,
positive form.
The skill held two contradictory instructions. Its runnable example published
correctly (
-p <devPort>:<containerPort>), but a contract bullet said:An agent that followed the bullet ran
-p 127.0.0.1:<hostPort>:<containerPort>,binding the builder container's own loopback. Requests from outside arrive on
that container's bridge address, so nothing answered them: every real user got a
connection reset while the app stayed perfectly healthy from inside. Which
instruction won depended on how the model weighted them, so the failure appeared
intermittently rather than reproducibly.
The bullet was also wrong on its own terms. Inside the builder container
0.0.0.0means "all interfaces of this container", not "exposed to the internet"; the
loopback restriction belongs to the control plane's publish of the outer
container's ports, which the inner binding cannot weaken.
every interface of this container — with the one clause of reasoning that stops
an agent "hardening" it back. The
--network=hostprohibition is replaced by thepositive rule it implied: give each app container its own network, or the default.
curl 127.0.0.1:<port>from inside thebuilder container reaches the app over the same loopback a wrongly-bound publish
uses, so it returned
200for an app nobody outside could load — the check couldnot detect this failure, which is why agents reported success. It now also expects
port <container>to report0.0.0.0:<port>.Three drift-guard tests added: every
-pin the file is a barehost:containerpair, the rule and its reason are present, and the health check inspects the
binding.