Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Do not merge: running test for fix #37236

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: release
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sagar-qa007
Copy link
Contributor

@sagar-qa007 sagar-qa007 commented Nov 5, 2024

Description

Tip

Add a TL;DR when the description is longer than 500 words or extremely technical (helps the content, marketing, and DevRel team).

Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change. Add links to Notion, Figma or any other documents that might be relevant to the PR.

Fixes #37234

Automation

/ok-to-test tags=""

🔍 Cypress test results

Caution

If you modify the content in this section, you are likely to disrupt the CI result for your PR.

Communication

Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?

  • Yes
  • No

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the test file path to focus on the "Widgets Sidebar" testing within the Cypress framework.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 5, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve updating the limited-tests.txt file in the Cypress testing framework. The path for a test file has been modified from cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Templates/Fork_Template_spec.js to cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/ExplorerTests/Widgets_Sidebar.ts, indicating a shift in testing focus from the "Fork Template" to the "Widgets Sidebar". Other comments in the file remain unchanged.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
app/client/cypress/limited-tests.txt Updated test file path from Fork_Template_spec.js to Widgets_Sidebar.ts

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Verify and fix randomly failing test cases on TBP (#37234)

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

Task, skip-changelog, ok-to-test

Suggested reviewers

  • ApekshaBhosale

🌟 In the land of tests, a change took flight,
From Fork Template's grasp, to Widgets' delight.
A path redefined, a focus anew,
In Cypress we trust, our tests will break through! 🌈


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@sagar-qa007
Copy link
Contributor Author

/ci-test-limit-count run_count=100

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 5, 2024

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
app/client/cypress/limited-tests.txt (1)

Line range hint 1-6: Consider adding documentation about test selection criteria.

The file would benefit from additional comments explaining:

  • Criteria for selecting tests in this file
  • Whether these tests are known to be stable/unstable
  • Any special considerations for CI runs
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6660bd9 and c3b3f78.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • app/client/cypress/limited-tests.txt (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
app/client/cypress/limited-tests.txt (1)

Pattern app/client/cypress/**/**.*: Review the following e2e test code written using the Cypress test library. Ensure that:

  • Follow best practices for Cypress code and e2e automation.
  • Avoid using cy.wait in code.
  • Avoid using cy.pause in code.
  • Avoid using agHelper.sleep().
  • Use locator variables for locators and do not use plain strings.
  • Use data-* attributes for selectors.
  • Avoid Xpaths, Attributes and CSS path.
  • Avoid selectors like .btn.submit or button[type=submit].
  • Perform logins via API with LoginFromAPI.
  • Perform logout via API with LogOutviaAPI.
  • Perform signup via API with SignupFromAPI.
  • Avoid using it.only.
  • Avoid using after and aftereach in test cases.
  • Use multiple assertions for expect statements.
  • Avoid using strings for assertions.
  • Do not use duplicate filenames even with different paths.
  • Avoid using agHelper.Sleep, this.Sleep in any file in code.
🔇 Additional comments (1)
app/client/cypress/limited-tests.txt (1)

2-2: ⚠️ Potential issue

Clarify the relationship between test changes and failing test fixes.

The change switches from Fork_Template_spec.js to Widgets_Sidebar.ts, but it's unclear how this addresses the randomly failing tests mentioned in issue #37234.

Let's check both test files:

Please clarify:

  1. Was Fork_Template_spec.js one of the failing tests?
  2. Why was it replaced with Widgets_Sidebar.ts?
  3. How does this change help resolve the randomly failing test cases?

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 5, 2024

Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11683154731.
Cypress dashboard: Click here!
The following are new failures, please fix them before merging the PR:
To know the list of identified flaky tests - Refer here

***** Repeat Run Summary ***** Total Tests with repeat: 400 Total Passed: 400 Total Failed: 0 Total Skipped: 0 *****************************

@sagar-qa007 sagar-qa007 reopened this Nov 12, 2024
@sagar-qa007
Copy link
Contributor Author

/ci-test-limit-count run_count=100

Copy link

Copy link

Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11792894715.
Cypress dashboard: Click here!
The following are new failures, please fix them before merging the PR:
To know the list of identified flaky tests - Refer here

***** Repeat Run Summary ***** Total Tests with repeat: 400 Total Passed: 400 Total Failed: 0 Total Skipped: 0 *****************************

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant