-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Do not merge: running test for fix #37236
base: release
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve updating the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
/ci-test-limit-count run_count=100 |
Tests running at: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11683154731. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
app/client/cypress/limited-tests.txt (1)
Line range hint
1-6
: Consider adding documentation about test selection criteria.The file would benefit from additional comments explaining:
- Criteria for selecting tests in this file
- Whether these tests are known to be stable/unstable
- Any special considerations for CI runs
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
app/client/cypress/limited-tests.txt
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
app/client/cypress/limited-tests.txt (1)
Pattern app/client/cypress/**/**.*
: Review the following e2e test code written using the Cypress test library. Ensure that:
- Follow best practices for Cypress code and e2e automation.
- Avoid using cy.wait in code.
- Avoid using cy.pause in code.
- Avoid using agHelper.sleep().
- Use locator variables for locators and do not use plain strings.
- Use data-* attributes for selectors.
- Avoid Xpaths, Attributes and CSS path.
- Avoid selectors like .btn.submit or button[type=submit].
- Perform logins via API with LoginFromAPI.
- Perform logout via API with LogOutviaAPI.
- Perform signup via API with SignupFromAPI.
- Avoid using it.only.
- Avoid using after and aftereach in test cases.
- Use multiple assertions for expect statements.
- Avoid using strings for assertions.
- Do not use duplicate filenames even with different paths.
- Avoid using agHelper.Sleep, this.Sleep in any file in code.
🔇 Additional comments (1)
app/client/cypress/limited-tests.txt (1)
2-2
:
Clarify the relationship between test changes and failing test fixes.
The change switches from Fork_Template_spec.js
to Widgets_Sidebar.ts
, but it's unclear how this addresses the randomly failing tests mentioned in issue #37234.
Let's check both test files:
Please clarify:
- Was
Fork_Template_spec.js
one of the failing tests? - Why was it replaced with
Widgets_Sidebar.ts
? - How does this change help resolve the randomly failing test cases?
Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11683154731.
|
/ci-test-limit-count run_count=100 |
Tests running at: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11792894715. |
Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11792894715.
|
Description
Tip
Add a TL;DR when the description is longer than 500 words or extremely technical (helps the content, marketing, and DevRel team).
Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change. Add links to Notion, Figma or any other documents that might be relevant to the PR.
Fixes #
37234
Automation
/ok-to-test tags=""
🔍 Cypress test results
Caution
If you modify the content in this section, you are likely to disrupt the CI result for your PR.
Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
Summary by CodeRabbit