-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 188
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: If loading a certain namespace fails, only attempt to retrieve t… #300
Conversation
…he corresponding namespace from the backup instead of attempting to retrieve all namespaces from the backup
WalkthroughThe recent modification focuses on enhancing the configuration synchronization process within a specific function. By altering the argument used in a backup configuration loading method, the update aims at improving the accuracy and efficiency of the configuration management system. This small, yet significant change, streamlines the process of keeping configurations synchronized across different components. Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
感谢您提出Pull Request,我会尽快Review。我会在1-2日内进行查看或者回复,如果遇到节假日可能会处理较慢,敬请谅解。 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- component/remote/sync.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 1
component/remote/sync.go (1)
- 111-111: The change to pass the
namespace
variable toloadBackupConfig
instead ofappConfig.NamespaceName
aligns with the PR's objective to refine error handling by focusing on the specific namespace that encountered a loading issue. This targeted approach should enhance the efficiency of the error recovery process. However, it's crucial to ensure that this change does not inadvertently affect other parts of the system that rely on the previous behavior.
- The modification is logically sound and directly addresses the issue described in the PR objectives.
- It's recommended to verify that this change does not impact other components or functionalities that might have depended on the broader recovery attempt. This can be done by reviewing usage of the
loadBackupConfig
function elsewhere in the codebase and ensuring that its new behavior is compatible with all use cases.Verification successful
The analysis of the
loadBackupConfig
function calls across the codebase indicates that the change insync.go
, where thenamespace
variable is now passed instead ofappConfig.NamespaceName
, is compatible with the existing call inasync.go
. Both calls adhere to the function's signature, suggesting that the change should not adversely affect the system's functionality. However, it's advisable to review the internal logic ofloadBackupConfig
to ensure it can correctly handle inputs from both contexts, focusing on the specific namespace that encountered a loading issue and the broader application configuration.
- The modification to pass the
namespace
variable toloadBackupConfig
insync.go
is consistent with the function's usage elsewhere in the codebase and aligns with the PR's objectives.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other calls to loadBackupConfig to ensure they are compatible with the change. rg "loadBackupConfig" --type goLength of output: 343
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 8136293155Details
💛 - Coveralls |
…he corresponding namespace from the backup instead of attempting to retrieve all namespaces from the backup
Summary by CodeRabbit