Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Add support for controlling the NettyTransport's byteBuf alloc… #1709

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: 1.1.x
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

He-Pin
Copy link
Member

@He-Pin He-Pin commented Jan 14, 2025

…ator type. (#1707)

  • chore: Add support for controlling the NettyTransport's byteBuf allocator type.

  • chore: extract deriveByteBufAllocator method

(cherry picked from commit dbc9ed3)

related thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread/6lj5lbg18hz4n9zckn0b89p9mv9nz14g

…ator type. (apache#1707)

* chore: Add support for controlling the NettyTransport's byteBuf allocator type.

* chore: extract deriveByteBufAllocator method

(cherry picked from commit dbc9ed3)
@pjfanning
Copy link
Contributor

This is grey area for me. Whether a change like this be in a patch. If it is really useful then I'd support merging it. That said, I'd prefer if the Flink team test with a 1.2 snapshot and then if they confirm that they get the behaviour that they want then we can merge this.

@He-Pin
Copy link
Member Author

He-Pin commented Jan 18, 2025

image

@pjfanning
Copy link
Contributor

pjfanning commented Jan 18, 2025

image

I'm the type of person who puts more faith in opinions if they are backed up by work like in testing Flink with a Pekko snapshot that supports this config before we go to the effort of doing releases.

Example build with this change.

https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/pekko/pekko-actor_2.13/1.2.0-M0+55-a75bc7a7-SNAPSHOT/

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants